Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30547761›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2018

Profiling grapevine trunk pathogens in planta: a case for community-targeted DNA metabarcoding.

Abraham Morales-Cruz, Rosa Figueroa-Balderas, Jadran F García, Eric Tran, Philippe E Rolshausen, Kendra Baumgartner, Dario Cantu

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Pomegranate Woody Mycobiota Associated with Wood Decay.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. DNA barcoding of phytopathogens for disease diagnostics and bio-surveillance.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abraham Morales-CruzDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Rosa Figueroa-BalderasDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Jadran F GarcíaDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Eric TranDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Philippe E RolshausenDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Kendra BaumgartnerUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Dario CantuDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. dacantu@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4858-1508

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA metabarcoding, commonly used in exploratory microbial ecology studies, is a promising method for the simultaneous in planta-detection of multiple pathogens associated with disease complexes, such as the grapevine trunk diseases. Profiling of pathogen communities associated with grapevine trunk diseases is particularly challenging, due to the presence within an individual wood lesion of multiple co-infecting trunk pathogens and other wood-colonizing fungi, which span a broad range of taxa in the fungal kingdom. As such, we designed metabarcoding primers, using as template the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer of grapevine trunk-associated ascomycete fungi (GTAA) and compared them to two universal primer widely used in microbial ecology.

resultsWe first performed in silico simulations and then tested the primers by high-throughput amplicon sequencing of (i) multiple combinations of mock communities, (ii) time-course experiments with controlled inoculations, and (iii) diseased field samples from vineyards under natural levels of infection. All analyses showed that GTAA had greater affinity and sensitivity, compared to those of the universal primers. Importantly, with GTAA, profiling of mock communities and comparisons with shotgun-sequencing metagenomics of field samples gave an accurate representation of genera of important trunk pathogens, namely Phaeomoniella, Phaeoacremonium, and Eutypa, the abundances of which were over- or under-estimated with universal primers.

conclusionsOverall, our findings not only demonstrate that DNA metabarcoding gives qualitatively and quantitatively accurate results when applied to grapevine trunk diseases, but also that primer customization and testing are crucial to ensure the validity of DNA metabarcoding results.

Indexed as

AscomycotaDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, FungalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomicsMycological Typing TechniquesPlant DiseasesVitisDNA, FungalAmplicon sequencingBotryosphaeria diebackEscaEutypa diebackGrapevine trunk diseasesHigh-throughput DNA sequencingMetagenomicsPhomopsis dieback

Identifiers

PMID30547761
PMCPMC6295080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.