Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30547740›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2018

Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish.

Andre L S Garcia, Brian Bosworth, Geoffrey Waldbieser, Ignacy Misztal, Shogo Tsuruta, Daniela A L Lourenco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Genetic Parameter Estimation of Body Weight andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  11. Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction of Meat Yield in Pacific Whiteleg Shrimp (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Potential negative effects of genomic selection.Journal of animal science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andre L S GarciaAnimal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. andre.garcia@uga.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-7978
Brian BosworthWarmwater Aquaculture Research Unit (WARU), USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS, 30776, USA.
Geoffrey WaldbieserWarmwater Aquaculture Research Unit (WARU), USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS, 30776, USA.
Ignacy MisztalAnimal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Shogo TsurutaAnimal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Daniela A L LourencoAnimal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
University of Georgia · US

Funding

ARS-USDA 58-6066-6-025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatfish farming is the largest segment of US aquaculture and research is ongoing to improve production efficiency, including genetic selection programs to improve economically important traits. The objectives of this study were to investigate the use of genomic selection to improve breeding value accuracy and to identify major single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with harvest weight and residual carcass weight in a channel catfish population. Phenotypes were available for harvest weight (n = 27,160) and residual carcass weight (n = 6020), and 36,365 pedigree records were available. After quality control, genotypes for 54,837 SNPs were available for 2911 fish. Estimated breeding values (EBV) were obtained with traditional pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and genomic (G)EBV were estimated with single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). EBV and GEBV prediction accuracies were evaluated using different validation strategies. The ability to predict future performance was calculated as the correlation between EBV or GEBV and adjusted phenotypes.

resultsCompared to the pedigree BLUP, ssGBLUP increased predictive ability up to 28% and 36% for harvest weight and residual carcass weight, respectively; and GEBV were superior to EBV for all validation strategies tested. Breeding value inflation was assessed as the regression coefficient of adjusted phenotypes on breeding values, and the results indicated that genomic information reduced breeding value inflation. Genome-wide association studies based on windows of 20 adjacent SNPs indicated that both harvest weight and residual carcass weight have a polygenic architecture with no major SNPs (the largest SNPs explained 0.96 and 1.19% of the additive genetic variation for harvest weight and residual carcass weight respectively).

conclusionsGenomic evaluation improves the ability to predict future performance relative to traditional BLUP and will allow more accurate identification of genetically superior individuals within catfish families.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsBody WeightBreedingFemaleForecastingGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsGenotypeIctaluridaeMaleModels, GeneticPedigreePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, Heritable

Identifiers

PMID30547740
PMCPMC6295041
OpenAlexW2905256367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.