Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30547412›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2018

The 'Neglected' Personal Neglect.

Pietro Caggiano, Mervi Jehkonen

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Autophagia in a Patient with Dementia and Hemineglect: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Disconnections in personal neglect.Brain structure & function · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bodies in the NovelFrontiers in psychology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: Current Insights.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pietro CaggianoPsychology Department, Goldsmiths University of London, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW, UK. psp01pc@gold.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5560-4870
Mervi JehkonenFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Goldsmiths University of London · GBTampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A review of patients with brain injury showing personal neglect is presented. The aim is to shed light on this aspect of neglect often unresearched or only indirectly investigated, and to discuss recent findings concerning the methods used to assess personal neglect, its neural correlates and its association with the more often explored aspect of extrapersonal neglect. The review was performed using PubMed and PsychInfo databases to search for papers published in the last 123 years (until January 2018). We reviewed 81 papers describing either single or group studies for a total of 2247 patients. The results of this review showed that various aspects of personal neglect are still controversial and outcomes potentially contradictory. Despite the data reported in the present review suggest that personal neglect is more frequently associated with lesions of the right hemisphere, the left hemisphere may also play an important role. Not surprisingly, personal neglect and extrapersonal neglect seem to co-occur. However double dissociations of these two forms of neglect have been reported, and they seem to dissociate both from a functional and an anatomical perspective. More recent interpretations of personal neglect suggest that it may result from a disrupted body representation. The development of reliable psychometric tools with shared diagnostic criteria is essential to identify different degrees of personal neglect for different body parts and to better refine personal neglect in comparison to extrapersonal neglect and disorders related to distortions of personal domain.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesHumansPerceptual DisordersStrokeAnosognosiaAssessmentBrain damageExtrapersonal neglectHemispatial neglectNeuropsychologyPersonal neglectStroke

Identifiers

PMID30547412
PMCPMC6327000
OpenAlexW2905412294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.