Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30547290›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2019

Public housing and healthcare use: an investigation using linked administrative data.

Aynslie M Hinds, Brian Bechtel, Jino Distasio, Leslie L Roos, Lisa M Lix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Good Farewell? Positive Exits from Federal Housing Assistance and Lower Acute Healthcare Utilization.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aynslie M HindsDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, S113-750 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0W3, Canada. umhinds0@myumanitoba.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9978-0785
Brian BechtelCross Ministry and Community Partnership Initiatives, Community and Social Services, 3rd floor, 10044-108 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 5E6, Canada.
Jino DistasioDepartment of Geography, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3B 2E9, Canada.
Leslie L RoosDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, S113-750 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0W3, Canada.
Lisa M LixDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, S113-750 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0W3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigated whether a move to public housing affects people's use of healthcare services.

methodUsing administrative data from Manitoba, the number of hospitalizations, general practitioner (GP), specialist and emergency department (ED) visits, and prescription drugs dispensed in the years before and after the housing move-in date (2012/2013) were measured for a public housing and matched cohort. Generalized linear models with generalized estimating equations tested for differences between the cohorts in utilization trends. The data were modeled using Poisson (rate ratio, RR), negative binomial (incident rate ratio, IRR), and binomial (odds ratio, OR) distributions.

resultsGP visits (IRR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06) and prescriptions (IRR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.05) increased, while ED visits (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-1.00) and hospitalizations (OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.96) decreased over time. The public housing cohort had a significantly higher rate of GP visits (IRR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.13), ED visits (RR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.37), and prescriptions (IRR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.13), and was more likely to be hospitalized (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.21-1.61) compared to the matched cohort. The rate of inpatient days significantly decreased for the public housing cohort, but did not change for the matched cohort.

conclusionHealthcare use changed similarly over time (except inpatient days) for the two cohorts. Public housing provides a basic need to a population who has a high burden of disease and who may not be able to obtain and maintain housing in the private market.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesHumansManitobaPatient Acceptance of Health CarePublic HousingAdministrative dataHealthcare useHealth servicesHealth statusPublic housingRecord linkage

Identifiers

PMID30547290
PMCPMC6964390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.