Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30547275›Full record

ReviewJournal of patient-reported outcomes2018

Psychometric validation of the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire in ulcerative colitis: results from a systematic literature review.

Aaron Yarlas, Stephen M Maher, Martha S Bayliss, Andrew Lovley, Joseph C Cappelleri, Marco D DiBonaventura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Individual Work Attitudes and Work Ability.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Workplace Assessment Scale: Pilot Validation Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aaron YarlasOptum, 1301 Atwood Avenue, Suite 311N, Johnston, RI, 02919, USA. ayarlas@qualitymetric.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4600-259X
Stephen M MaherOptum, 1301 Atwood Avenue, Suite 311N, Johnston, RI, 02919, USA.
Martha S BaylissOptum, 1301 Atwood Avenue, Suite 311N, Johnston, RI, 02919, USA.
Andrew LovleyOptum, 1301 Atwood Avenue, Suite 311N, Johnston, RI, 02919, USA.
Joseph C CappelleriPfizer, 445 Eastern Point Road, MS 8260-2502, Groton, CT, 06340, USA.
Marco D DiBonaventuraPfizer, 235 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with ulcerative colitis, a type of inflammatory bowel disease, report negative impacts of disease symptoms on work-related outcomes, including absenteeism and presenteeism. As a way to better understand the impact of this disease and its treatment on work-related outcomes, the current review examines the use of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI), a patient-reported outcomes measure of absenteeism, presenteeism, and impairment in other activities, in studies of patients with ulcerative colitis. This review assesses the measurement properties of the WPAI in this patient population: its reliability, construct validity, ability to detect change, and responsiveness to effective treatments. Relevant data were extracted from 13 sources (journal articles and conference posters) identified following a systematic review of the published and gray literature. The evidence supports the WPAI as having test-retest reliability (reproducibility) over time; convergent validity, as indicated by moderate correlations with measures of quality of life and moderate-to-strong correlations with measures of disease activity; known-groups validity, as indicated by differences in WPAI scores between patients with active and inactive disease; ability (sensitivity) to detect change, as indicated by substantial improvement in scores for patients who achieve remission, accompanied by substantial worsening of scores for patients who relapse; and, responsiveness to treatment, with improvements in scores following treatments that reduce disease activity. Limitations included a lack of available evidence from randomized-controlled trials that could speak more directly to the WPAI's responsiveness to treatment. In conclusion, we recommend the use of the WPAI for measuring work outcomes in both observational studies and interventional trials that include patients with ulcerative colitis.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismInflammatory bowel diseaseLiterature reviewPresenteeismUlcerative colitisWork productivityWork productivity and activity impairment questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID30547275
PMCPMC6292832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.