ArticleReproductive biomedicine & society online2018
What makes people ready to conceive? Findings from the International Fertility Decision-Making Study.
Article in Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Childbearing intention and its associated factors: A systematic review.Nursing open · 2021Pooled it
- Experiences and actions taken by women to address delayed conception in Delhi, India: A qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Kindergarten development and fertility intention: an empirical study from China.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- A randomized controlled clinical trial of the effect of positive psychology on childbearing Intention and Stages of behavior change in reproductive age women.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Perception and Childbirth Decision-Making in Unintended Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- "An obedient wife never says "no" to her virtual god." High fertility conceptions and barriers to contraceptive use among mothers of Southern Pakistan: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- What factors influence couples' decisions to have children? Evidence from a systematic scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Structural transition of parenthood among Chinese nulliparous couples with planned pregnancies, 2013-2019.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Qualitative Examination of the Role and Influence of Mothers-in-Law on Young Married Couples' Family Planning in Rural Maharashtra, India.Global health, science and practice · 2022Article
- An online survey of UK women's attitudes to having children, the age they want children and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Parenthood aspirations and understanding of factors that affect the chance of achieving them: A population survey.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2022Article
- Preconditions to parenthood: changes over time and generations.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2021Article
- A wonderful experience or a frightening commitment? An exploration of men's reasons to (not) have children.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated fertility decision-making in people currently trying to conceive, and examined whether factors that make people ready to conceive differ by gender and country. The study used data from the International Fertility Decision-Making Study, a cross-sectional study of 10,045 participants (1690 men and 8355 women) from 79 countries. Respondents were aged 18-50 years (mean 31.8 years), partnered and had been trying to conceive for > 6 months (mean 2.8 years). Respondents indicated their need for parenthood; their own/partner's desire for a child; and the influence of certain preconditions, motivational forces and subjective norms in relation to readiness to conceive. Factor analysis of preconditions and motivational forces revealed four decisional factors: social status of parents, economic preconditions, personal and relational readiness, and physical health and child costs. Significant gender differences were found for desire for a child, decisional factors and subjective norms. Compared with men, women had higher personal desire for a child, and rated economic and personal and relational readiness as more influential. Men were more likely to rate subjective norms and social status of parents as more influential. Country comparisons found significant differences in personal desire for a child, partner's desire for a child, need for parenthood, preconditions, motivational forces and subjective norms. The results demonstrate that some decisional factors have a universal association with starting families (e.g. desire for a child), whilst the influence of others (e.g. personal and relational readiness) is dependent on contextual factors. These findings support the need for contemporary, prospective and international research on reproductive decision-making, and emphasize the need for effective fertility policies to take contextual factors into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.