ReviewBio-design and manufacturing2018
Multi-length scale bioprinting towards simulating microenvironmental cues.
Review in Bio-design and manufacturing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Viability in Static and Perfused 3D Tissue Constructs Using Sacrificial Gelatin Microparticles.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Biointerface Fiber Technology from Electrospinning to Inflight Printing.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Fabrication, sustainability, and key performance indicators of bioelectronics via fiber building blocks.Cell reports. Physical science · 2024Review
- Biofabrication methods for reconstructing extracellular matrix mimetics.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Biofabrication and biomanufacturing in Ireland and the UK.Bio-design and manufacturing · 2024Review
- Microcapillary cell extrusion deposition with picolitre dispensing resolution.Bio-design and manufacturing · 2023Article
- 3D printed biomimetic cochleae and machine learning co-modelling provides clinical informatics for cochlear implant patients.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Enhancing Peptide Biomaterials for Biofabrication.Polymers · 2021Review
- Manufacturing micropatterned collagen scaffolds with chemical-crosslinking for development of biomimetic tissue-engineered oral mucosa.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Fabrication of Designable and Suspended Microfibers via Low-Voltage 3D Micropatterning.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2019Article
- Integrated 3D bioprinting-based geometry-control strategy for fabricating corneal substitutes.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. BArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is envisaged that the creation of cellular environments at multiple length scales, that recapitulate in vivo bioactive and structural roles, may hold the key to creating functional, complex tissues in the laboratory. This review considers recent advances in biofabrication and bioprinting techniques across different length scales. Particular focus is placed on 3D printing of hydrogels and fabrication of biomaterial fibres that could extend the feature resolution and material functionality of soft tissue constructs. The outlook from this review discusses how one might create and simulate microenvironmental cues in vitro. A fabrication platform that integrates the competencies of different biofabrication technologies is proposed. Such a multi-process, multiscale fabrication strategy may ultimately translate engineering capability into an accessible life sciences toolkit, fulfilling its potential to deliver in vitro disease models and engineered tissue implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.