ArticleClinical & translational immunology2018
Analysis of serum macrophage migration inhibitory factor and D-dopachrome tautomerase in systemic sclerosis.
Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The immune landscape of systemic sclerosis: from pathogenic mechanisms to precision therapeutic breakthroughs.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The multifaced role of the macrophage migration inhibitory factor family in organ fibrosis.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2025Review
- Immunogenetics of Systemic Sclerosis.Genes · 2024Review
- Macrophages in inflammatory skin diseases and skin tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Macrophage migration inhibitory factor levels are associated with disease activity and possible complications in membranous nephropathy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Macrophage migration inhibitory factor family proteins are multitasking cytokines in tissue injury.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022Review
- The multifaceted roles of NLRP3-modulating proteins in virus infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Role of the Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in the Pathophysiology of Pre-Eclampsia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and its receptor CD74 in systemic sclerosis.Central-European journal of immunology · 2021Article
- D-dopachrome tautomerase from Japanese sea bass (Zoological research · 2020Article
- Analysis of serum interleukin(IL)-1α, IL-1β and IL-18 in patients with systemic sclerosis.Clinical & translational immunology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMacrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and D-dopachrome tautomerase (DDT), members of the same cytokine superfamily, are linked to the pathogenesis of a number of inflammatory diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate their clinical relevance in systemic sclerosis (SSc).
methodsSerum MIF and DDT were quantified in 105 SSc patients by ELISA and levels compared to healthy controls (HC) (47) and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (184). Clinical parameters included organ involvement, serum laboratory markers and results of pulmonary function tests, and overall disease activity assessed using the European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) activity index.
resultsThere was no significant difference in serum DDT concentrations between patients with SSc and HC. However, serum MIF was significantly increased in SSc compared to both HC and SLE cohorts. Serum MIF was increased in SSc patients with low forced vital capacity (FVC) and was also associated with the use of angiotensin II receptor blockers and beta blockers in SSc, confirmed after adjusting for the presence of systemic hypertension and low FVC. Serum DDT was significantly higher in SSc patients with low FEV1 and negatively correlated with EUSTAR score, particularly in patients with limited disease.
conclusionAlthough not significantly linked to specific clinical parameters, serum MIF was significantly higher in SSc patients than in HC and SLE patients, suggesting a fundamental role for MIF in SSc. DDT, while closely related to MIF, did not show a similar expression profile, suggesting functional differences between these molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.