ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2018
Radiotherapy-associated intra-abdominal angiosarcoma after prostatic adenocarcinoma: Case reports.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiosarcoma is a rare soft tissue neoplasm, which accounts for <1% of all soft tissue tumours. It has been previously reported that the incidence rate of angiosarcomas increases following radiotherapy. The present study reports two cases of intra-abdominal angiosarcoma associated with previous radiotherapy treatment. To the best of our knowledge, these associations have not been previously described in English literature. The patients aged 71 and 83 years were admitted to the center for abdominal pain and diarrhea. Each patient had previously had treatment with radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma. During their hospitalization, biopsies were obtained and the diagnosis of angiosarcoma was reached. In each patient the tumors had irregular proliferating vascular channels, lined by atypical endothelial cells, which varied from elongated and spindle-shaped to large and plump. Immunocytochemistry revealed that the tumor cells were positive for the cytoplasmic endothelial markers cluster of differentiation (CD)31 and CD34. The recognition of these associations is important and their occurrence in this rare type of neoplasm should not mislead the pathologist and cause a misdiagnosis of the sarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.