Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30546870›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2019

Effect of enhanced detailing and mass media on community use of oral rehydration salts and zinc during a scale-up program in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh.

Felix Lam, George Pro, Shreya Agrawal, Vishal Dev Shastri, Leslie Wentworth, Melinda Stanley, Nitin Beri, Abhishek Tupe, Ashutosh Mishra, Hamsa Subramaniam and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Felix LamClinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
George ProNorthern Arizona University, Center for Health Equity, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Shreya AgrawalTeach for America, New York, New York, USA.
Vishal Dev ShastriAlive & Thrive / FHI Solutions LLC, New Delhi, India.
Leslie WentworthClinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Melinda StanleyClinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nitin BeriClinton Health Access Initiative, New Delhi, India.
Abhishek TupeClinton Health Access Initiative, New Delhi, India.
Ashutosh MishraRTI International India, New Delhi, India.
Hamsa SubramaniamUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Kate SchroderClinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Marta Rose PrescottClinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Naresh TrikhaClinton Health Access Initiative, New Delhi, India.

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Clinton Health Access Initiative implemented a program from 2012-2016 to increase use of oral rehydration salts (ORS) and zinc to treat diarrhea in children under five in three states in India: Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh. The program interventions included detailing and development of a rural supply chain to reach private rural health care providers, training of Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), technical support to the state governments, and a mass media campaign targeted at caregivers. In Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh, some of the program activities, such as detailing and ASHA trainings, were targeted to high-burden focal districts, thus providing an opportunity to study their effect compared to statewide activities that covered all districts, such as the mass media campaign. Our study aimed to estimate the effect of activities on ORS and zinc use.

methodsHousehold surveys were conducted at two points during the program and in both focal and non-focal districts. We used a difference-in-difference quasi-experimental approach to estimate the effect of the enhanced activities in focal districts and mass media campaign on the odds of a child being treated with ORS and zinc.

findingsFocal district interventions were associated with a significant increase in the odds of a diarrhea episode receiving ORS in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh. Living in focal districts increased the odds of receiving ORS in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh by factors of 3.42 (95% CI = 1.39-8.33) and 2.29 (95% CI = 1.19-4.39), respectively. Focal district interventions were also associated with 15.02 (95% CI = 2.97-75.19) greater odds of receiving both ORS and zinc in Gujarat. In Uttar Pradesh, where the mass media campaign was focused, exposure to the campaign further modified the odds of receiving ORS and combined ORS and zinc by 1.38 (95% CI = 1.04-1.84) and 1.57 (95% CI = 1.01-2.46), respectively.

conclusionComprehensive public and private provider interventions combined with mass media are effective strategies for increasing ORS and zinc use.

Indexed as

Mass MediaChild, PreschoolDiarrheaFemaleFluid TherapyHealth PromotionHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaleProgram EvaluationSaltsSurveys and QuestionnairesZincSaltsZinc

Identifiers

PMID30546870
PMCPMC6287208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.