Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30546855›Full record

ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia

Oxford Cognitive Screen - Brazilian Portuguese version (OCS-Br) A pilot study.

Claudia Cristina Ferreira Ramos, Daniel Krempel Amado, Conrado Regis Borges, Eduardo Bergamaschi, Ricardo Nitrini, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Dutch Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS-NL): psychometric properties in Flemish stroke survivors.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  7. The European Portuguese version of the Oxford Cognitive Screening (OCS-Pt): a screening test for acute stroke patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claudia Cristina Ferreira RamosCognitive and Behavioral Neurology Group - Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Daniel Krempel AmadoCognitive and Behavioral Neurology Group - Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Conrado Regis BorgesCognitive and Behavioral Neurology Group - Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo BergamaschiCognitive and Behavioral Neurology Group - Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo NitriniCognitive and Behavioral Neurology Group - Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Sonia Maria Dozzi BruckiCognitive and Behavioral Neurology Group - Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is very common in stroke patients and underdiagnosed. Symptoms such as language, praxis, visuospatial, visuoconstructive and memory impairment are prominent. The screening cognitive tests available do not address some specific characteristics of stroke patients and have major limitations in relation to the most impaired cognitive domains.

objectiveTo test the applicability of a Brazilian version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen in a convenience sample of individuals with normal cognition.

methodsThirty neurologically healthy participants underwent the OCS-Br in this pilot study.

resultsThe mean score on each task was: naming: 3.4 (SD=0.72) (maximum value of 4); semantics: 3 (SD=0) (maximum 3); orientation: 4 (SD=0) (maximum 4); visual field: 4 (SD=0) (maximum 4); sentence reading: 14.53 (SD: 1) (maximum 15); number writing: 2.86 (0.6) (maximum 3); calculation: 3.8 (SD=0.48) (maximum 4); and accuracy on the broken hearts test: 47.3 (3.3) (maximum 50). The scores obtained were similar to those of the English original sample.

conclusionWe observed similar values on each separate OCS task in comparison to the original test, confirming that the Brazilian Portuguese version is comparable to other studies.

Indexed as

cognitive screeningnormative dataOxford Cognitive Screenstroke

Identifiers

PMID30546855
PMCPMC6289483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.