ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2015
Coronary angioscopic imaging of in-stent restenosis after biolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Effects of Peptides from Venom of Social Wasp and Scorpion on Multidrug-ResistantToxins · 2019Article
- Editorial: Remaining issue after drug-eluting stent implantation: Histopathological mechanisms of early-phase in-stent restenosis.Journal of cardiology cases · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 69-year-old man underwent repeat percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis in the obtuse marginal artery 8 months after biolimus-eluting stent (2.5 × 28 mm Nobori stent, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) implantation. Coronary angiography showed focal stenosis in the distal part of the stent. Intravascular ultrasound revealed low echoic heterogeneous intimal tissue. Optical coherence tomography also revealed a heterogeneous finding classified as a layered pattern. Coronary angioscopy detected a white mass with a paste-like appearance at the stenosis extending around the in-stent restenosis as a thin membrane where stent strut could be seen transparently. A small part of the mass was swinging in the blood stream. Coronary angioscopic imaging was beneficial for the understanding of the suspected mechanism and feature of the in-stent restenosis after second-generation stent implantation, which was apparently different from neointimal hyperplasia after bare-metal stent implantation. <
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.