ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Gastric calcifying fibrous tumor: A clinicopathological study of nine cases.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastric Calcifying Fibrous Tumor: An Easy Misdiagnosis as Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor-A Systemic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Pooled it
- A scoring model for differentiating gastric calcifying fibrous tumors from gastrointestinal stromal tumors less than 2 cm based on CT features.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for gastric calcifying fibrous tumor: a case report and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- EUS features and clinical outcomes of gastric calcifying fibrous tumor: a retrospective analysis of 20 cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Calcifying fibrous tumor of the gastrointestinal tract: A clinicopathologic review and update.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics presented in 9 cases of gastric calcifying fibrous tumor (CFT), and investigate the expressions and clinical implications of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), estrogen receptor (ER) and vimentin in gastric CFTs. The clinical and pathological information of 9 patients with CFTs was investigated retrospectively. Subsequently, the expression of GPER, ER and vimentin were examined using immunohistochemistry, and a literature search for gastric CFT was conducted. The 9 patients were 40-71 years old with a mean age of 52.22 years, including 6 female and 3 male patients. Pathological features included dense hyalinized collagen fibers with a psammomatous body or dystrophic calcification, and the infiltration of scattered lymphocytes and plasma cells. Immunohistochemically, all cases expressed vimentin and GPER, whereas ER expression was negative. Using a database research, 25 studies regarding gastric CFT were identified, including 48 cases with a sex ratio (female:male) of 1.4:1. In addition, the number of female patients was twice the number of male patients in patients <50 years old, whereas the number was almost equal between women and men ≥50 years of age. Gastric CFT is a benign lesion with a good prognosis and a predilection for female patients, particularly premenopausal women. Estrogen may serve a role in this female predominance, and this may be mediated by GPER rather than ER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.