Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30546301›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2018

A Cell Atlas for the Mouse Brain.

Csaba Erö, Marc-Oliver Gewaltig, Daniel Keller, Henry Markram

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 151 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lasting aversive consequences of a single dose of 4-hydroxytamoxifen.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Spatiotemporal cell type deconvolution leveraging tissue structure.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Synaptic integration and competition in the substantia nigra pars reticulata-An experimental and in silico analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Csaba EröBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marc-Oliver GewaltigBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Daniel KellerBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Henry MarkramBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite vast numbers of studies of stained cells in the mouse brain, no current brain atlas provides region-by-region neuron counts. In fact, neuron numbers are only available for about 4% of brain of regions and estimates often vary by as much as 3-fold. Here we provide a first 3D cell atlas for the whole mouse brain, showing cell positions constructed algorithmically from whole brain Nissl and gene expression stains, and compared against values from the literature. The atlas provides the densities and positions of all excitatory and inhibitory neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia in each of the 737 brain regions defined in the AMBA. The atlas is dynamic, allowing comparison with previously reported numbers, addition of cell types, and improvement of estimates as new data is integrated. The atlas also provides insights into cellular organization only possible at this whole brain scale, and is publicly available.

Indexed as

Allen brain atlascell numbersgliamouse brainneurons

Identifiers

PMID30546301
PMCPMC6280067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.