ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2018
Training Augmented Intelligent Capabilities for Pharmacovigilance: Applying Deep-learning Approaches to Individual Case Safety Report Processing.
Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Governing AI for Pharmacovigilance in Low-Income Countries: Systems Perspective.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- An industry perspective on the use of machine learning in drug and vaccine safety.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2023Article
- Search, identification, and curation of cell and gene therapy product regulations using augmented intelligent systems.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- The Coming of Age of AI/ML in Drug Discovery, Development, Clinical Testing, and Manufacturing: The FDA Perspectives.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023Article
- Challenges and opportunities for mining adverse drug reactions: perspectives from pharma, regulatory agencies, healthcare providers and consumers.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
- Supervised Machine Learning-Based Decision Support for Signal Validation Classification.Drug safety · 2022Article
- Seasonal variations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in coastal sediments of a marine resource hot spot: the case of pars special economic energy zone, Iran.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2021Article
- Developing Crowdsourced Training Data Sets for Pharmacovigilance Intelligent Automation.Drug safety · 2021Article
- Automation Opportunities in Pharmacovigilance: An Industry Survey.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2020Article
- Adverse Drug Reaction Case Safety Practices in Large Biopharmaceutical Organizations from 2007 to 2017: An Industry Survey.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2019Article
- Healthcare personnel's experience of reporting adverse drug reactions in Baghdad city: cross-sectional study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019Article
- Artificial Intelligence Within Pharmacovigilance: A Means to Identify Cognitive Services and the Framework for Their Validation.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRegulations are increasing the scope of activities that fall under the remit of drug safety. Currently, individual case safety report (ICSR) collection and collation is done manually, requiring pharmacovigilance professionals to perform many transactional activities before data are available for assessment and aggregated analyses. For a biopharmaceutical company to meet its responsibilities to patients and regulatory bodies regarding the safe use and distribution of its products, improved business processes must be implemented to drive the industry forward in the best interest of patients globally. Augmented intelligent capabilities have already demonstrated success in capturing adverse events from diverse data sources. It has potential to provide a scalable solution for handling the ever-increasing ICSR volumes experienced within the industry by supporting pharmacovigilance professionals' decision-making.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to train and evaluate a consortium of cognitive services to identify key characteristics of spontaneous ICSRs satisfying an acceptable level of accuracy determined by considering business requirements and effective use in a real-world setting. The results of this study will serve as supporting evidence for or against implementing augmented intelligence in case processing to increase operational efficiency and data quality consistency.
methodsA consortium of ten cognitive services to augment aspects of ICSR processing were identified and trained through deep-learning approaches. The input data for model training were 20,000 ICSRs received by Celgene drug safety over a 2-year period. The data were manually made machine-readable through the process of transcription, which converts images into text. The machine-readable documents were manually annotated for pharmacovigilance data elements to facilitate the training and testing of the cognitive services. Once trained by cognitive developers, the cognitive services' output was reviewed by pharmacovigilance subject-matter experts against the accepted ground-truth for correctness and completeness. To be considered adequately trained and functional, each cognitive service was required to reach a threshold of F
resultsAll ten cognitive services under development have reached an evaluative score ≥ 75% for spontaneous ICSRs.
conclusionAll cognitive services under development have achieved the minimum evaluative threshold to be considered adequately trained, demonstrating how machine-learning and natural language processing techniques together provide accurate outputs that may augment pharmacovigilance professionals' processing of spontaneous ICSRs quickly and accurately. The intention of augmented intelligence is not to replace the pharmacovigilance professional, but rather support them in their consistent decision-making so that they may better handle the overwhelming amount of data otherwise manually curated and monitored for ongoing drug surveillance requirements. Through this supported decision-making, pharmacovigilance professionals may have more time to apply their knowledge in assessing the case rather than spending it performing transactional tasks to simply capture the pertinent data within a safety database. By capturing data consistently and efficiently, we begin to build a corpus of data upon which analyses may be conducted and insights gleaned. Cognitive services may be key to an organization's transformation to more proactive decision-making needed to meet regulatory requirements and enhance patient safety.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.