Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30546259›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2018

Training Augmented Intelligent Capabilities for Pharmacovigilance: Applying Deep-learning Approaches to Individual Case Safety Report Processing.

Danielle Abatemarco, Sujan Perera, Sheng Hua Bao, Sameen Desai, Bruno Assuncao, Niki Tetarenko, Karolina Danysz, Ruta Mockute, Mark Widdowson, Nicole Fornarotto and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Danielle Abatemarco1Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3405-810X
Sujan PereraIBM Watson Health, 75 Binney Street, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA.
Sheng Hua BaoIBM Watson Health, 75 Binney Street, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA.
Sameen Desai1Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 USA.
Bruno Assuncao1Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 USA.
Niki Tetarenko1Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 USA.
Karolina Danysz1Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 USA.
Ruta Mockute1Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 USA.
Mark Widdowson1Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 USA.
Nicole Fornarotto1Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 USA.
Sheryl Beauchamp1Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 USA.
Salvatore Cicirello1Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 USA.
Edward Mingle1Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRegulations are increasing the scope of activities that fall under the remit of drug safety. Currently, individual case safety report (ICSR) collection and collation is done manually, requiring pharmacovigilance professionals to perform many transactional activities before data are available for assessment and aggregated analyses. For a biopharmaceutical company to meet its responsibilities to patients and regulatory bodies regarding the safe use and distribution of its products, improved business processes must be implemented to drive the industry forward in the best interest of patients globally. Augmented intelligent capabilities have already demonstrated success in capturing adverse events from diverse data sources. It has potential to provide a scalable solution for handling the ever-increasing ICSR volumes experienced within the industry by supporting pharmacovigilance professionals' decision-making.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to train and evaluate a consortium of cognitive services to identify key characteristics of spontaneous ICSRs satisfying an acceptable level of accuracy determined by considering business requirements and effective use in a real-world setting. The results of this study will serve as supporting evidence for or against implementing augmented intelligence in case processing to increase operational efficiency and data quality consistency.

methodsA consortium of ten cognitive services to augment aspects of ICSR processing were identified and trained through deep-learning approaches. The input data for model training were 20,000 ICSRs received by Celgene drug safety over a 2-year period. The data were manually made machine-readable through the process of transcription, which converts images into text. The machine-readable documents were manually annotated for pharmacovigilance data elements to facilitate the training and testing of the cognitive services. Once trained by cognitive developers, the cognitive services' output was reviewed by pharmacovigilance subject-matter experts against the accepted ground-truth for correctness and completeness. To be considered adequately trained and functional, each cognitive service was required to reach a threshold of F

resultsAll ten cognitive services under development have reached an evaluative score ≥ 75% for spontaneous ICSRs.

conclusionAll cognitive services under development have achieved the minimum evaluative threshold to be considered adequately trained, demonstrating how machine-learning and natural language processing techniques together provide accurate outputs that may augment pharmacovigilance professionals' processing of spontaneous ICSRs quickly and accurately. The intention of augmented intelligence is not to replace the pharmacovigilance professional, but rather support them in their consistent decision-making so that they may better handle the overwhelming amount of data otherwise manually curated and monitored for ongoing drug surveillance requirements. Through this supported decision-making, pharmacovigilance professionals may have more time to apply their knowledge in assessing the case rather than spending it performing transactional tasks to simply capture the pertinent data within a safety database. By capturing data consistently and efficiently, we begin to build a corpus of data upon which analyses may be conducted and insights gleaned. Cognitive services may be key to an organization's transformation to more proactive decision-making needed to meet regulatory requirements and enhance patient safety.

Identifiers

PMID30546259
PMCPMC6267537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.