ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2018
Constructing treatment decision rules based on scalar and functional predictors when moderators of treatment effect are unknown.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05025787 (EN20-01), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
EN20-01: A 24 Week Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CNTX-6970 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Knee Osteoarthritis Pain.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prospective individual patient data meta-analysis: Evaluating convalescent plasma for COVID-19.Statistics in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- A sparse additive model for treatment effect-modifier selection.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2022Trial
- Unsupervised Bayesian classification for models with scalar and functional covariates.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2024Article
- Article
- Optimising treatment decision rules through generated effect modifiers: a precision medicine tutorial.BJPsych open · 2019Article
- Statistical Analysis Plan for Stage 1 EMBARC (Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care) Study.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2017Article
- Flexible functional regression methods for estimating individualized treatment regimes.Stat (International Statistical Institute) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment response heterogeneity poses serious challenges for selecting treatment for many diseases. To better understand this heterogeneity and to help in determining the best patient-specific treatments for a given disease, many clinical trials are collecting large amounts of patient-level data prior to administering treatment in the hope that some of these data can be used to identify moderators of treatment effect. These data can range from simple scalar values to complex functional data such as curves or images. Combining these various types of baseline data to discover "biosignatures" of treatment response is crucial for advancing precision medicine. Motivated by the problem of selecting optimal treatment for subjects with depression based on clinical and neuroimaging data, we present an approach that both (1) identifies covariates associated with differential treatment effect and (2) estimates a treatment decision rule based on these covariates. We focus on settings where there is a potentially large collection of candidate biomarkers consisting of both scalar and functional data. The validity of the proposed approach is justified via extensive simulation experiments and illustrated using data from a placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating antidepressant treatment response in subjects with depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.