Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30546042›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2018

Complementary topology of maintenance and manipulation brain networks in working memory.

S W Davis, C A Crowell, L Beynel, L Deng, D Lakhlani, S A Hilbig, W Lim, D Nguyen, A V Peterchev, B M Luber and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Structural Controllability Predicts Functional Patterns and Brain Stimulation Benefits Associated with Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

S W DavisDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. simon.davis@duke.edu.
C A CrowellDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
L BeynelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
L DengCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
D LakhlaniDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
S A HilbigDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
W LimDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
D NguyenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
A V PeterchevDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-065X
B M LuberNational Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
S H LisanbyNational Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
L G AppelbaumDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
R CabezaCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Non-invasive Neuromodulation Unit (NNU)ZIAMH002955 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ZARATE, CARLOS · 2016 to 2025
$40.3M
Using fMRI-guided TMS to increase central executive function in older adults - Administrative SupplementU01AG050618 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI APPELBAUM, LAWRENCE G., CABEZA, ROBERTO · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Using fMRI-guided TMS to increase central executive function in older adultsR01AG050618 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI APPELBAUM, LAWRENCE G., CABEZA, ROBERTO · 2015 to 2015
$497k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050618NIA NIH HHS U01 AG050618U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) U01AG050618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is assumed to consist of a process that sustains memory representations in an active state (maintenance) and a process that operates on these activated representations (manipulation). We examined evidence for two distinct, concurrent cognitive functions supporting maintenance and manipulation abilities by testing brain activity as participants performed a WM alphabetization task. Maintenance was investigated by varying the number of letters held in WM and manipulation by varying the number of moves required to sort the list alphabetically. We found that both maintenance and manipulation demand had significant effects on behavior that were associated with different cortical regions: maintenance was associated with bilateral prefrontal and left parietal cortex, and manipulation with right parietal activity, a link that is consistent with the role of parietal cortex in symbolic computations. Both structural and functional architecture of these systems suggested that these cognitive functions are supported by two dissociable brain networks. Critically, maintenance and manipulation functional networks became increasingly segregated with increasing demand, an effect that was positively associated with individual WM ability. These results provide evidence that network segregation may act as a protective mechanism to enable successful performance under increasing WM demand.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermNerve NetParietal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID30546042
PMCPMC6292901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.