Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30546004›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

Breast Cancer Cell Line Phenotype Affects Sonoporation Efficiency Under Optimal Ultrasound Microbubble Conditions.

Nina Qu, Dandan Shi, Mengmeng Shang, Sujuan Duan, Lu Guo, Song Ning, Jie Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sonoporation of Cells by a Parallel Stable Cavitation Microbubble Array.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nina QuDepartment of Ultrasound, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Dandan ShiDepartment of Ultrasound, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Mengmeng ShangDepartment of Ultrasound, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Sujuan DuanDepartment of Ultrasound, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Lu GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Song NingDepartment of Ultrasound, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Jie LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Ultrasound/microbubble (USMB)-mediated sonoporation is a new strategy with minimal procedural invasiveness for targeted and site-specific drug delivery to tumors. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of different breast cancer cell lines on sonoporation efficiency, and then to identify an optimal combination of USMB parameters to maximize the sonoporation efficiency for each tumor cell line. MATERIAL AND METHODS Three drug-sensitive breast cell lines - MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-468 - and 1 multidrug resistance (MDR) cell line - MCF-7/ADR - were chosen. An orthogonal array experimental design approach based on 3 levels of 3 parameters (A: microbubble concentration, 10%, 20%, and 30%, B: sound intensity, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 W/cm², C: irradiation time, 30, 60, and 90 s) was employed to optimize the sonoporation efficiency. RESULTS The optimal USMB parameter combinations for different cell lines were diverse. Under optimal parameter combinations, the maximum sonoporation efficiency differences between different breast tumor cell lines were statistically significant (MDA-MB-231: 46.70±5.79%, MDA-MB-468: 53.44±5.69%, MCF-7: 59.88±5.53%, MCF-7/ADR: 65.39±4.01%, P<0.05), so were between drug-sensitive cell line and MDR cell line (MCF-7: 59.88±5.53%, MCF-7/ADR: 65.39±4.01%, p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS Different breast tumor cell lines have their own optimal sonoporation. Drug-resistant MCF-7/ADR cells had higher sonoporation efficiency than drug-sensitive MCF-7 cells. The molecular subtype of tumors should be considered when sonoporation is applied, and optimal parameter combination may have the potential to improve drug-delivery efficiency by increasing the sonoporation efficiency.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDrug Delivery SystemsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsMicrobubblesPhenotypeResearch DesignUltrasonic TherapyUltrasonic Waves

Identifiers

PMID30546004
PMCPMC6302661
OpenAlexW2903658402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.