Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30545977›Full record

ReviewThe European respiratory journal2019

The importance of patient perspectives in pulmonary hypertension.

Michael D McGoon, Pisana Ferrari, Iain Armstrong, Migdalia Denis, Luke S Howard, Gabi Lowe, Sanjay Mehta, Noriko Murakami, Brad A Wong

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European respiratory journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Exploring the patient perspective in pulmonary hypertension.The European respiratory journal · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael D McGoonCardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Pisana FerrariPulmonary Hypertension Association Europe, Vienna, Austria.
Iain ArmstrongPulmonary Hypertension Association UK, Sheffield, UK.
Migdalia DenisSociedad Latina de Hipertensión Pulmonar, Venezuela.
Luke S HowardNational Pulmonary Hypertension Service, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Gabi LoweJenna Lowe Trust, Republic of South Africa.
Sanjay MehtaLondon Health Sciences Centre, Division of Respirology, Dept of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University and Pulmonary Hypertension Association Canada, London, ON, Canada.
Noriko MurakamiPulmonary Hypertension Association Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Brad A WongPulmonary Hypertension Association, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBMayo Clinic · USPulmonary Hypertension Association · USWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of objective measurement of cardiopulmonary status has helped us achieve better clinical outcomes for patients and develop new therapies through to the point of market access; however, patient surveys indicate that more can be done to improve holistic care and patient engagement. In this multidisciplinary review, we examine how clinical teams can acknowledge and embrace the individual patient's perspective, and thus improve the care for individual patients suffering from pulmonary hypertension by cultivating the importance and relevance of health-related quality of life in direct clinical care. At the individual level, patients should be provided with access to accredited specialist centres which provide a multidisciplinary approach where there is a culture focused on narrative medicine, quality of life, shared decision making and timely access to palliative care, and where there is participation in education. On a larger scale, we call for the development, expansion and promotion of patient associations to support patients and carers, lobby for access to best care and treatments, and provide input into the development of clinical trials and registries, focusing on the patients' perspective.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient ParticipationHumansHypertension, PulmonaryPalliative CareQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID30545977
PMCPMC6351339
OpenAlexW2903775115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.