ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2019
Surgical treatment and survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark, England, Norway, and Sweden: a population-based study.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Survival Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of oral nutritional supplements on chemotherapy tolerance and overall survival in postoperative colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Trial
- Prognostic nomogram for colorectal cancer patients with multi-organ metastases: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Trial
- Associations of CT-Derived Skeletal Muscle Index and Density With Postoperative Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- A modified Delphi consensus on fusion (laparoscopic and robotic) approaches to colorectal surgery in Asia-Pacific.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Impact of Age on Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Resection in Selected Patients Undergoing Primary Anastomosis: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive surgical resection reduces one-year mortality, especially in high-risk colon cancer patients: an emulated trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- EIF4A3/circPTGR1/miR-4725-5p positive- feedback loop promotes colorectal cancer progression via FAK/AKT signaling pathway.Molecular cancer · 2026Article
- Impact of preoperative handgrip strength and frailty on early postoperative loss of independence in patients with colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Risk assessment of daikenchuto-induced hepatobiliary injury in colon cancer patients post-colectomy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- A retrospective cohort study on the differential overall survival rates between surgical intervention and chemotherapy in stage IV pancreatic cancer patients.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Moving from theory to practice: implementing a prehabilitation program before gastrointestinal cancer surgery (PREHAB-GI).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Prognostic nomogram for T3-T4 primary colorectal cancer patients with perineural invasion after surgery: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Lymph node yield as a surrogate marker for tumour biology and prognosis in colon cancer.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk of recurrence in early-onset versus late-onset non-metastatic colorectal cancer, 2004-2019: a nationwide cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Article
- Article
- Pleasurable and problematic receptive anal intercourse and diseases of the colon, rectum and anus.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024Review
- A comparison of frailty measures in population-based data for patients with colorectal cancer.Age and ageing · 2024Article
- Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurvival from colorectal cancer has been shown to be lower in Denmark and England than in comparable high-income countries. We used data from national colorectal cancer registries to assess whether differences in the proportion of patients receiving resectional surgery could contribute to international differences in colorectal cancer survival.
methodsIn this population-based study, we collected data from all patients aged 18-99 years diagnosed with primary, invasive, colorectal adenocarcinoma from Jan 1, 2010, to Dec 31, 2012, in Denmark, England, Norway, and Sweden, from national colorectal cancer registries. We estimated age-standardised net survival using multivariable modelling, and we compared the proportion of patients receiving resectional surgery by stage and age. We used logistic regression to predict the resectional surgery status patients would have had if they had been treated as in the best performing country, given their individual characteristics.
findingsWe extracted registry data for 139 457 adult patients with invasive colorectal adenocarcinoma: 12 958 patients in Denmark, 97 466 in England, 11 450 in Norway, and 17 583 in Sweden. 3-year colon cancer survival was lower in England (63·9%, 95% CI 63·5-64·3) and Denmark (65·7%, 64·7-66·8) than in Norway (69·5%, 68·4-70·5) and Sweden (72·1%, 71·2-73·0). Rectal cancer survival was lower in England (69·7%, 69·1-70·3) than in the other three countries (Denmark 72·5%, 71·1-74·0; Sweden 74·1%, 72·7-75·4; and Norway 75·0%, 73·1-76·8). We found no significant differences in survival for patients with stage I disease in any of the four countries. 3-year survival after stage II or III rectal cancer and stage IV colon cancer was consistently lower in England (stage II rectal cancer 86·4%, 95% CI 85·0-87·6; stage III rectal cancer 75·5%, 74·2-76·7; and stage IV colon cancer 20·5%, 19·9-21·1) than in Norway (94·1%, 91·5-96·0; 83·4%, 80·1-86·1; and 33·0%, 31·0-35·1) and Sweden (92·9%, 90·8-94·6; 80·6%, 78·2-82·7; and 23·7%, 22·0-25·3). 3-year survival after stage II rectal cancer and stage IV colon cancer was also lower in England than in Denmark (stage II rectal cancer 91·2%, 88·8-93·1; and stage IV colon cancer 23·5%, 21·9-25·1). The total proportion of patients treated with resectional surgery ranged from 47 803 (68·4%) of 69 867 patients in England to 9582 (81·3%) of 11 786 in Sweden for colon cancer, and from 16 544 (59·9%) of 27 599 in England to 4106 (70·8%) of 5797 in Sweden for rectal cancer. This range was widest for patients older than 75 years (colon cancer 19 078 [59·7%] of 31 946 patients in England to 4429 [80·9%] of 5474 in Sweden; rectal cancer 4663 [45·7%] of 10 195 in England to 1342 [61·9%] of 2169 in Sweden), and the proportion of patients treated with resectional surgery was consistently lowest in England. The age gradient of the decline in the proportion of patients treated with resectional surgery was steeper in England than in the other three countries in all stage categories. In the hypothetical scenario where all patients were treated as in Sweden, given their age, sex, and disease stage, the largest increase in resectional surgery would be for patients with stage III rectal cancer in England (increasing from 70·3% to 88·2%).
interpretationSurvival from colon cancer and rectal cancer in England and colon cancer in Denmark was lower than in Norway and Sweden. Survival paralleled the relative provision of resectional surgery in these countries. Differences in patient selection for surgery, especially in patients older than 75 years or individuals with advanced disease, might partly explain these differences in international colorectal cancer survival.
fundingEarly Diagnosis Policy Research Grant from Cancer Research UK (C7923/A18348).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.