ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018
The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Role of Mutations, Addition of Amino Acids, and Exchange of Genetic Information in the Coevolution of Primitive Coding Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Self-similarity and the maximum entropy principle in the genetic code.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2023Article
- Symmetrical distributions of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases during the evolution of the genetic code.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2023Article
- Rare-event sampling analysis uncovers the fitness landscape of the genetic code.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Modelling Emergence ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Designing Collagen-Binding Peptide with Enhanced Properties Using Hydropathic Free Energy Predictions.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Influence of the Selection at the Amino Acid Level on Synonymous Codon Usage from the Viewpoint of Alternative Genetic Codes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Modeling emergence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Frameshift and wild-type proteins are often highly similar because the genetic code and genomes were optimized for frameshift tolerance.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Model of Genetic Code Structure Evolution under Various Types of Codon Reading.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Little Evidence the Standard Genetic Code Is Optimized for Resource Conservation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- On the Origin of Frameshift-Robustness of the Standard Genetic Code.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- The Mutational Robustness of the Genetic Code and Codon Usage in Environmental Context: A Non-Extremophilic Preference?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- How To Quantify a Genetic Firewall? A Polarity-Based Metric for Genetic Code Engineering.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021Article
- Large-scale in silico mutagenesis experiments reveal optimization of genetic code and codon usage for protein mutational robustness.BMC biology · 2020Article
- Basic principles of the genetic code extension.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- The influence of different types of translational inaccuracies on the genetic code structure.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Genetic codes optimized as a traveling salesman problem.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe standard genetic code (SGC) is a unique set of rules which assign amino acids to codons. Similar amino acids tend to have similar codons indicating that the code evolved to minimize the costs of amino acid replacements in proteins, caused by mutations or translational errors. However, if such optimization in fact occurred, many different properties of amino acids must have been taken into account during the code evolution. Therefore, this problem can be reformulated as a multi-objective optimization task, in which the selection constraints are represented by measures based on various amino acid properties.
resultsTo study the optimality of the SGC we applied a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and we used the representatives of eight clusters, which grouped over 500 indices describing various physicochemical properties of amino acids. Thanks to that we avoided an arbitrary choice of amino acid features as optimization criteria. As a consequence, we were able to conduct a more general study on the properties of the SGC than the ones presented so far in other papers on this topic. We considered two models of the genetic code, one preserving the characteristic codon blocks structure of the SGC and the other without this restriction. The results revealed that the SGC could be significantly improved in terms of error minimization, hereby it is not fully optimized. Its structure differs significantly from the structure of the codes optimized to minimize the costs of amino acid replacements. On the other hand, using newly defined quality measures that placed the SGC in the global space of theoretical genetic codes, we showed that the SGC is definitely closer to the codes that minimize the costs of amino acids replacements than those maximizing them.
conclusionsThe standard genetic code represents most likely only partially optimized systems, which emerged under the influence of many different factors. Our findings can be useful to researchers involved in modifying the genetic code of the living organisms and designing artificial ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.