Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30545289›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018

The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm.

Małgorzata Wnętrzak, Paweł Błażej, Dorota Mackiewicz, Paweł Mackiewicz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Self-similarity and the maximum entropy principle in the genetic code.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modelling Emergence ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modeling emergence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How To Quantify a Genetic Firewall? A Polarity-Based Metric for Genetic Code Engineering.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Basic principles of the genetic code extension.Royal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Małgorzata WnętrzakDepartment of Genomics, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Wrocław, ul. Joliot-Curie 14a, 50-383, Wrocław, Poland.
Paweł BłażejDepartment of Genomics, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Wrocław, ul. Joliot-Curie 14a, 50-383, Wrocław, Poland.
Dorota MackiewiczDepartment of Genomics, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Wrocław, ul. Joliot-Curie 14a, 50-383, Wrocław, Poland.
Paweł MackiewiczDepartment of Genomics, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Wrocław, ul. Joliot-Curie 14a, 50-383, Wrocław, Poland. pamac@smorfland.uni.wroc.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-4855-497X
University of Wrocław · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe standard genetic code (SGC) is a unique set of rules which assign amino acids to codons. Similar amino acids tend to have similar codons indicating that the code evolved to minimize the costs of amino acid replacements in proteins, caused by mutations or translational errors. However, if such optimization in fact occurred, many different properties of amino acids must have been taken into account during the code evolution. Therefore, this problem can be reformulated as a multi-objective optimization task, in which the selection constraints are represented by measures based on various amino acid properties.

resultsTo study the optimality of the SGC we applied a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and we used the representatives of eight clusters, which grouped over 500 indices describing various physicochemical properties of amino acids. Thanks to that we avoided an arbitrary choice of amino acid features as optimization criteria. As a consequence, we were able to conduct a more general study on the properties of the SGC than the ones presented so far in other papers on this topic. We considered two models of the genetic code, one preserving the characteristic codon blocks structure of the SGC and the other without this restriction. The results revealed that the SGC could be significantly improved in terms of error minimization, hereby it is not fully optimized. Its structure differs significantly from the structure of the codes optimized to minimize the costs of amino acid replacements. On the other hand, using newly defined quality measures that placed the SGC in the global space of theoretical genetic codes, we showed that the SGC is definitely closer to the codes that minimize the costs of amino acids replacements than those maximizing them.

conclusionsThe standard genetic code represents most likely only partially optimized systems, which emerged under the influence of many different factors. Our findings can be useful to researchers involved in modifying the genetic code of the living organisms and designing artificial ones.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEvolution, MolecularGenetic CodeAmino AcidsCodonDiscriminant AnalysisModels, GeneticOperator Regions, GeneticAmino AcidsCodonEvolutionGenetic algorithmMutationOptimizationStandard genetic codeTranslation

Identifiers

PMID30545289
PMCPMC6293558
OpenAlexW2905180743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.