Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30545284›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018

A phylogenomic resolution of the sea urchin tree of life.

Nicolás Mongiardino Koch, Simon E Coppard, Harilaos A Lessios, Derek E G Briggs, Rich Mooi, Greg W Rouse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The mitochondrial genome of the deep-sea pyramid urchinMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Echinoid skeleton: an insight on the species-specific pattern of theJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolás Mongiardino KochDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. nicolas.mongiardinokoch@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-5869
Simon E CoppardDepartment of Biology, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY, USA.
Harilaos A LessiosSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama.
Derek E G BriggsDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Rich MooiDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology and Geology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Greg W RouseScripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAAmerican Museum of Natural History · USCalifornia Academy of Sciences · USScripps Institution of Oceanography · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEchinoidea is a clade of marine animals including sea urchins, heart urchins, sand dollars and sea biscuits. Found in benthic habitats across all latitudes, echinoids are key components of marine communities such as coral reefs and kelp forests. A little over 1000 species inhabit the oceans today, a diversity that traces its roots back at least to the Permian. Although much effort has been devoted to elucidating the echinoid tree of life using a variety of morphological data, molecular attempts have relied on only a handful of genes. Both of these approaches have had limited success at resolving the deepest nodes of the tree, and their disagreement over the positions of a number of clades remains unresolved.

resultsWe performed de novo sequencing and assembly of 17 transcriptomes to complement available genomic resources of sea urchins and produce the first phylogenomic analysis of the clade. Multiple methods of probabilistic inference recovered identical topologies, with virtually all nodes showing maximum support. In contrast, the coalescent-based method ASTRAL-II resolved one node differently, a result apparently driven by gene tree error induced by evolutionary rate heterogeneity. Regardless of the method employed, our phylogenetic structure deviates from the currently accepted classification of echinoids, with neither Acroechinoidea (all euechinoids except echinothurioids), nor Clypeasteroida (sand dollars and sea biscuits) being monophyletic as currently defined. We show that phylogenetic signal for novel resolutions of these lineages is strong and distributed throughout the genome, and fail to recover systematic biases as drivers of our results.

conclusionsOur investigation substantially augments the molecular resources available for sea urchins, providing the first transcriptomes for many of its main lineages. Using this expanded genomic dataset, we resolve the position of several clades in agreement with early molecular analyses but in disagreement with morphological data. Our efforts settle multiple phylogenetic uncertainties, including the position of the enigmatic deep-sea echinothurioids and the identity of the sister clade to sand dollars. We offer a detailed assessment of evolutionary scenarios that could reconcile our findings with morphological evidence, opening up new lines of research into the development and evolutionary history of this ancient clade.

Indexed as

GenomicsPhylogenyAnimalsKelpLikelihood FunctionsSea UrchinsSpecies SpecificityEchinoideaGenomePhylogenomicsSand dollarsSea urchinsTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30545284
PMCPMC6293586
OpenAlexW2892522953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.