Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30545241›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation2019

The Diagnostic Utility of p16 Immunostaining in Differentiating Cancer and HSIL from LSIL and Benign in Cervical Cells.

Ming-Zhe Wu, Shiyu Wang, Min Zheng, Li-Xiang Tian, Xin Wu, Ke-Jun Guo, Y I Zhang, Guang-Ping Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Evaluating the Performance of p16Cancer management and research · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ming-Zhe Wu1 Department of Gynecology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Shiyu Wang2 Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
Min Zheng3 Department of Pathology, Changchun Obstetrics-Gynecology Hospital, Changchun, China.
Li-Xiang Tian3 Department of Pathology, Changchun Obstetrics-Gynecology Hospital, Changchun, China.
Xin Wu1 Department of Gynecology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Ke-Jun Guo1 Department of Gynecology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Y I Zhang1 Department of Gynecology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Guang-Ping Wu4 Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital and College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
First Hospital of China Medical University · CNChangchun Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital · CNChina Medical University · CNCommonwealth Medical College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical liquid-based cytology plays an important role in the diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL). However, cytological evaluation alone has a relatively low sensitive. To overcome this problem, HPV DNA testing or HPV DNA combined with cytology has been applied. HPV DNA testing significantly improved the sensitivity, but the specificity is low, especially in cancer and high-grade SIL (HSIL) cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of p16 overexpression in cervical cells of patients with HSIL and cancer. The expression of p16 was detected by immunostaining in liquid-based cells from cervical brushing in 278 patients which including: Cancer ( n = 13), HSIL ( n = 112), low-grade SIL (LSIL) ( n = 45), and Benign ( n = 108). The expression levels of p16 were significantly higher in the cancer and HSIL groups when compared with the LSIL and Benign groups ( P < 0.01). The accurate diagnostic rates of cancer and HSIL were significantly increased by p16 immunostaining plus cytology than that by cytology alone ( P < 0.01). The false negative or false positive of p16 immunostaining occurred with a unicellular pattern. With sensitivity of 96.0% and accuracy of 91.7%, the diagnostic performance of p16 immunostaining was much better than that of cytology alone with sensitivity of 36.0% and accuracy of 70.9% ( P < 0.01). p16 immunostaining in cervical brushing cells may not only be used as an ancillary tool to cytological diagnosis of cervical neoplasia but also help to distinguish HSIL from LSIL and the triage of transient infection.

Indexed as

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p18FemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p18high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesionhuman papellomavirusliquid-based cytologylow-grade squamous intraepithelial lesionp16 immunostaining

Identifiers

PMID30545241
PMCPMC6362523
OpenAlexW2905431093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.