Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30545160›Full record

ArticleGenes2018

Ancient Ancestry Informative Markers for Identifying Fine-Scale Ancient Population Structure in Eurasians.

Umberto Esposito, Ranajit Das, Syakir Syed, Mehdi Pirooznia, Eran Elhaik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ancestry estimation: Methodological evolution and forensic implications.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. aYChr-DB: a database of ancient human Y haplogroups.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020
    Article
  10. Journal of biosciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Umberto EspositoDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. u.esposito@sheffield.ac.uk.
Ranajit DasManipal University, Manipal Centre for Natural Sciences (MCNS), Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India. ranajit.das@manipal.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5308-3477
Syakir SyedDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. syakir.syed@gmail.com.
Mehdi PiroozniaBioinformatics and Computational Biology, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA mehdi.pirooznia@nih.gov. mehdi.pirooznia@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-4210-6458
Eran ElhaikDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. e.elhaik@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4795-1084

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_14115Medical Research Council MR/R025126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid accumulation of ancient human genomes from various areas and time periods potentially enables the expansion of studies of biodiversity, biogeography, forensics, population history, and epidemiology into past populations. However, most ancient DNA (aDNA) data were generated through microarrays designed for modern-day populations, which are known to misrepresent the population structure. Past studies addressed these problems by using ancestry informative markers (AIMs). It is, thereby, unclear whether AIMs derived from contemporary human genomes can capture ancient population structures, and whether AIM-finding methods are applicable to aDNA, provided that the high missingness rates in ancient-and oftentimes haploid-DNA can also distort the population structure. Here, we define ancient AIMs (aAIMs) and develop a framework to evaluate established and novel AIM-finding methods in identifying the most informative markers. We show that aAIMs identified by a novel principal component analysis (PCA)-based method outperform all of the competing methods in classifying ancient individuals into populations and identifying admixed individuals. In some cases, predictions made using the aAIMs were more accurate than those made with a complete marker set. We discuss the features of the ancient Eurasian population structure and strategies to identify aAIMs. This work informs the design of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays and the interpretation of aDNA results, which enables a population-wide testing of primordialist theories.

Indexed as

admixture mapping, primordialismancient ancestry informative markersancient DNApopulation structureprincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID30545160
PMCPMC6316245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.