Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30544936›Full record

ReviewHigh-throughput2018

The Prenatal Microbiome: A New Player for Human Health.

Valeria D'Argenio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in High-throughput, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Changes in Gut Microbiota at 1-60 Days in 92 Preterm Infants in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Using 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The Human Gut Microbiome as a Potential Factor in Autism Spectrum Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Valeria D'ArgenioCEINGE-BiotecnologieAvanzate, via G. Salvatore via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy. dargenio@ceinge.unina.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9273-3698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last few years have featured an increasing interest in the study of the human microbiome and its correlations with health status. Indeed, technological advances have allowed the study of microbial communities to reach a previously unthinkable sensitivity, showing the presence of microbes also in environments usually considered as sterile. In this scenario, microbial communities have been described in the amniotic fluid, the umbilical blood cord, and the placenta, denying a dogma of reproductive medicine that considers the uterus like a sterile womb. This prenatal microbiome may play a role not only in fetal development but also in the predisposition to diseases that may develop later in life, and also in adulthood. Thus, the aim of this review is to report the current knowledge regarding the prenatal microbiome composition, its association with pathological processes, and the future perspectives regarding its manipulation for healthy status promotion and maintenance.

Indexed as

fetal developmenthealthy statusmetagenomicsprenatal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID30544936
PMCPMC6306741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.