ReviewMicromachines2018
Recent Advances in AIV Biosensors Composed of Nanobio Hybrid Material.
Review in Micromachines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Biosensors for Detection of COVID-19 and Other Viruses.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2023Pooled it
- Nanomaterials-based sensors for the detection of COVID-19: A review.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2022Review
- Forecasting the Post-Pandemic Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Using the Bullwhip Phenomenon Alongside Use of Nanosensors for Disease Containment and Cure.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cysteamine-Gold Coated Carboxylated Fluorescent Nanoparticle Mediated Point-of-Care Dual-Modality Detection of the H5N1 Pathogenic Virus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Viral outbreaks detection and surveillance using wastewater-based epidemiology, viral air sampling, and machine learning techniques: A comprehensive review and outlook.The Science of the total environment · 2022Review
- Carbon nanotubes in COVID-19: A critical review and prospects.Colloid and interface science communications · 2022Review
- Emerging materials for the electrochemical detection of COVID-19.Journal of electroanalytical chemistry (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Advancements in electrochemical biosensing for respiratory virus detection: A review.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2021Review
- Biosensors as a future diagnostic approach for COVID-19.Life sciences · 2021Review
- The potential application of electrochemical biosensors in the COVID-19 pandemic: A perspective on the rapid diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2021Review
- Nanomaterials to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic.Emergent materials · 2021Review
- Review
- Noble Metal Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors for Electrochemical and Optical Detection of Viruses Causing Respiratory Illnesses.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Review
- Biosensing based on field-effect transistors (FET): Recent progress and challenges.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2020Review
- Biosensors: frontiers in rapid detection of COVID-19.3 Biotech · 2020Review
- Field-Effect Sensors for Virus Detection: From Ebola to SARS-CoV-2 and Plant Viral Enhancers.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Recent Development of Aptasensor for Influenza Virus Detection.Biochip journal · 2020Review
- Current and Future Point-of-Care Tests for Emerging and New Respiratory Viruses and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Review
- Label-free localized surface plasmon resonance biosensor composed of multi-functional DNA 3 way junction on hollow Au spike-like nanoparticles (HAuSN) for avian influenza virus detection.Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Since the beginning of the 2000s, globalization has accelerated because of the development of transportation systems that allow for human and material exchanges throughout the world. However, this globalization has brought with it the rise of various pathogenic viral agents, such as Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Zika virus, and Dengue virus. In particular, avian influenza virus (AIV) is highly infectious and causes economic, health, ethnical, and social problems to human beings, which has necessitated the development of an ultrasensitive and selective rapid-detection system of AIV. To prevent the damage associated with the spread of AIV, early detection and adequate treatment of AIV is key. There are traditional techniques that have been used to detect AIV in chickens, ducks, humans, and other living organisms. However, the development of a technique that allows for the more rapid diagnosis of AIV is still necessary. To achieve this goal, the present article reviews the use of an AIV biosensor employing nanobio hybrid materials to enhance the sensitivity and selectivity of the technique while also reducing the detection time and high-throughput process time. This review mainly focused on four techniques: the electrochemical detection system, electrical detection method, optical detection methods based on localized surface plasmon resonance, and fluorescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.