ReviewViruses2018
Chaperoning the
Review in Viruses, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strengthening global health resilience: Marburg virus-like particle vaccines and the One Health approach.Science in One Health · 2024Review
- Development of an efficient veterinary rabies vaccine production process in the avian suspension cell line AGE1.CR.pIX.BMC biotechnology · 2022Article
- Identification of Cytoplasmic Chaperone Networks Relevant for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Replication.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Negative-sense RNA viruses: An underexplored platform for examining virus-host lipid interactions.Molecular biology of the cell · 2021Review
- Hsp90 Is Required for Snakehead Vesiculovirus Replication via Stabilization of the Viral L Protein.Journal of virology · 2021Article
- Structures of theJournal of virology · 2020Review
- Update on lyssaviruses and rabies: will past progress play as prologue in the near term towards future elimination?Faculty reviews · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The order
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.