Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30544711›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

From Neuronal Differentiation of iPSCs to 3D Neuro-Organoids: Modelling and Therapy of Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Matteo Bordoni, Federica Rey, Valentina Fantini, Orietta Pansarasa, Anna Maria Di Giulio, Stephana Carelli, Cristina Cereda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advances in currentFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. EngineeringAPL bioengineering · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matteo BordoniGenomic and Post-Genomic Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy. matteo.bordoni@mondino.it.
Federica ReyLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy. federica.rey@unimi.it.
Valentina FantiniDepartment of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy. valentina.fantini@mondino.it.
Orietta PansarasaGenomic and Post-Genomic Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy. orietta.pansarasa@mondino.it.
Anna Maria Di GiulioLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy. annamaria.digiulio@unimi.it.
Stephana CarelliLaboratory of Pharmacology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy. stephana.carelli@unimi.it.
Cristina CeredaGenomic and Post-Genomic Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy. cristina.cereda@mondino.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, the advances made into the reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) led to great improvements towards their use as models of diseases. In particular, in the field of neurodegenerative diseases, iPSCs technology allowed to culture in vitro all types of patient-specific neural cells, facilitating not only the investigation of diseases' etiopathology, but also the testing of new drugs and cell therapies, leading to the innovative concept of personalized medicine. Moreover, iPSCs can be differentiated and organized into 3D organoids, providing a tool which mimics the complexity of the brain's architecture. Furthermore, recent developments in 3D bioprinting allowed the study of physiological cell-to-cell interactions, given by a combination of several biomaterials, scaffolds, and cells. This technology combines bio-plotter and biomaterials in which several types of cells, such as iPSCs or differentiated neurons, can be encapsulated in order to develop an innovative cellular model. IPSCs and 3D cell cultures technologies represent the first step towards the obtainment of a more reliable model, such as organoids, to facilitate neurodegenerative diseases' investigation. The combination of iPSCs, 3D organoids and bioprinting will also allow the development of new therapeutic approaches. Indeed, on the one hand they will lead to the development of safer and patient-specific drugs testing but, also, they could be developed as cell-therapy for curing neurodegenerative diseases with a regenerative medicine approach.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationModels, NeurologicalAnimalsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuronsOrganoids3D bioprintingcell culturedisease modellingiPSCsorganoidspersonalized medicineregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID30544711
PMCPMC6321164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.