SynthesisMedicine2018
Atrial fibrillation in athletes and general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- The application of virtual reality exposure versus relaxation training in music performance anxiety: a randomized controlled study.BMC psychiatry · 2023Trial
- Exercise and Atrial Fibrillation: Current Evidence, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Directions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- Masters athlete screening study (MASS): incidence of cardiovascular disease and major adverse cardiac events and efficacy of screening over five years.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2023Article
- Atrial Fibrillation in Endurance Training Athletes: Scoping Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2023Review
- Arrhythmogenesis of Sports: Myth or Reality?Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2022Review
- Holter-determined arrhythmias in young elite athletes with suspected risk: Insights from a 20-year experience.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2021Article
- The effects of endurance exercise on the heart: panacea or poison?Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2020Review
- Abnormal ECG Findings in Athletes: Clinical Evaluation and Considerations.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
- Exercise, Physical Activity, and Cardiometabolic Health: Insights into the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiometabolic Diseases.Cardiology in reviewArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of heart arrhythmia, but the impact of long-term, high-intensity endurance exercise on the risk of AF remains uncertain.
methodsPubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched till Nov 2017 to retrieve the articles. The included studies were summarized, pooled odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Both fixed and random effects models were used to combine the data. Stratified and logistic meta-regression analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity across studies.
resultsNine studies including 2308 athletes and 6593 controls were eligible. Our results showed that the risk of AF was significantly higher in athletes than in general population (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.04-5.28, Pheterogeneity<.001, I = 92.3%). Subgroup analysis based on gender and mean age demonstrated a significantly increased risk in men (OR = 4.03, 95% CI = 1.73-9.42, Pheterogeneity<.001, I = 82.7%) and participants with mean age <60 (OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.23-8.55, Pheterogeneity<.001, I = 84.3%). Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on type of athletes demonstrated a significantly increased risk of AF in participants with single type of sport (OR = 3.97, 95% CI = 1.16-13.62, Pheterogeneity = .018, I = 70.4%). Results remained unchanged after performing sensitivity analysis. Meta-regression showed that gender, age, type of study, sample size, and sports mode were unrelated to heterogeneity.
conclusionOur study confirmed that the risk of AF was significantly higher in athletes than in general population, especially among men and participants aged <60.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.