Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30544258›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2018

Barriers and opportunities to improve the foundations for high-quality healthcare in the Mexican Health System.

Svetlana V Doubova, Sebastián García-Saisó, Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas, Odet Sarabia-González, Paulina Pacheco-Estrello, Hannah H Leslie, Carmen Santamaría, Laura Del Pilar Torres-Arreola, Claudia Infante-Castañeda

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Parent's Perspective towards Child COVID-19 Vaccination: An Online Cross-Sectional Study in Mexico.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Svetlana V DoubovaEpidemiology and Health Services Research Unit, CMN Siglo XXI, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Av. Cuauhtemoc 330, Col. Doctores, Del. Cuauhtemoc, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sebastián García-SaisóGeneral Directorate for Quality of Healthcare and Education, Ministry of Health, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ricardo Pérez-CuevasHealth System Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Odet Sarabia-GonzálezGeneral Directorate for Quality of Healthcare and Education, Ministry of Health, Mexico City, Mexico.
Paulina Pacheco-EstrelloGeneral Directorate for Quality of Healthcare and Education, Ministry of Health, Mexico City, Mexico.
Hannah H LeslieDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Carmen SantamaríaBona Dea Salud, Mexico City, Mexico.
Laura Del Pilar Torres-ArreolaCenter for Evaluation and Surveys, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Claudia Infante-CastañedaInstitute of Social Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXHarvard Global Health Institute · USMexican Social Security Institute · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the foundations for quality of care (QoC) in the Mexican public health sector and identify barriers to quality evaluation and improvement from the perspective of the QoC leaders of the main public health sector institutions: Ministry of Health (MoH), the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) and the Institute of Social Security of State Workers (ISSSTE). We administered a semi-structured online questionnaire that gathered information on foundations (governance, health workforce, platforms, tools and population), evaluation and improvement activities for QoC; 320 leaders from MoH, IMSS and ISSSTE participated. We used thematic content and descriptive analyses to analyse the data. We found that QoC foundations, evaluation and improvement activities pose essential challenges for the Mexican health sector. Governance for QoC is weakly aligned across MoH, IMSS and ISSSTE. Each institution follows its own agenda of evaluation and improvement programmes and has distinct QoC indicators and information systems. The institutions share similar barriers to strengthening QoC: poor organizational structure at a facility level, scarcity of financial resources, lack of training in QoC for executive/managerial staff and health professionals and limited public participation. In conclusion, a stronger legal framework and policy dialogue is needed to foster governance by the MoH, to define and align health sector-wide QoC policies, and to set common goals and articulate QoC improvement actions among institutions. Robust QoC organizational structure with designated staff and clarity on their responsibilities should be established at all levels of healthcare. Investment is necessary to fund formal and in-service QoC training programmes for health professionals and to reinforce quality evaluation and improvement activities and quality information systems. QoC evaluation results should be available to healthcare providers and the population. Active public participation in the design and implementation of improvement initiatives should be strengthened.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchHealth WorkforceHumansMexicoPublic SectorQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareSurveys and Questionnairesbarriers and improvement opportunitiesfoundationsMexicoquality of care

Identifiers

PMID30544258
PMCPMC6415720
OpenAlexW2904599845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.