ArticleAesthetic surgery journal2019
The Surgical Treatment of Adult Acquired Buried Penis Syndrome: A New Classification System.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of adult acquired buried penis (AABP) reconstruction: a multicentre cohort study.International journal of impotence research · 2026Observational
- No difference between split-thickness and full-thickness skin grafts for surgical repair in adult acquired buried penis regarding surgical and functional outcomes: a comparative retrospective analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Adult acquired buried penis and bariatric surgery: a mighty motivator.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- The Role of Suprapubic Superficial Fascial System Reconstruction During Repair of Adult-Acquired Buried Penis.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Concealed penis: A review of multilevel classification and surgical reconstruction techniques.BJUI compass · 2025Review
- The Outcomes of Adult Acquired Buried Penis Surgical Reconstruction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Reconstruction of the male external genitalia in diverse disease processes: Our reconstructive algorithm, techniques, and experience.Current urology · 2022Article
- The concealed morbidity of buried penis: a narrative review of our progress in understanding adult-acquired buried penis as a surgical condition.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Review
- Article
- Effect of surgical repair of acquired buried penis on sexual function in adults.International urology and nephrology · 2020Article
- The Classification and Surgical Treatment of Adult Acquired Buried Penis Syndrome: A Call for Data and Collaboration.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdult acquired buried penis syndrome may be associated with an inability to void, sexual dysfunction, and recurrent infection. Previously published classification systems rely on intraoperative findings, such as penile skin quality.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes after adult acquired buried penis repair and to develop a classification system based on preoperative assessment.
methodsThe authors reviewed data from patients who underwent buried penis reconstruction at a single institution. Patient history and physical examination guided the development of a classification system for surgical planning.
resultsOf the 27 patients included, the mean age was 56 ± 15 years and mean body mass index was 49 ± 14 kg/m2. Patients were classified into 4 groups based on examination findings: (I) buried penis due to skin deficiency, iatrogenic scarring, and/or diseased penile skin (n = 3); (II) excess abdominal skin and fat (n = 6); (III) excess skin and fat with diseased penile skin (n = 16); and (IV) type III plus severe scrotal edema (n = 2). Surgical treatment (eg, excision and grafting, mons suspension, panniculectomy, translocation of testes, and/or scrotectomy) was tailored based on classification. Complications included wound breakdown (n = 3), cellulitis (n = 4), and hematoma (n = 1). Nearly all patients (96%) reported early satisfaction and improvement in their symptoms postoperatively.
conclusionsClassifying patients with buried penis according to preoperative examination findings may guide surgical decision-making and preoperative counseling and allow for optimized aesthetics to enhance self-esteem and sexual well-being. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.