ArticlePloS one2018
Student acceptance of e-learning methods in the laboratory class in Optometry.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of the efficacy of an online tool for improving the diagnosis of macular lesions imaged by optical coherence tomography.Journal of optometryTrial
- A global overview of anatomical science education and its present and future role in biomedical curricula.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Review
- Training in retinoscopy: learning curves using a standardized method.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Understanding the Functional Components of Technology-Enhanced Learning Environment in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.Medical science educator · 2023Article
- Pedagogical impact of integration of musculoskeletal anatomy blended learning on physiotherapy education.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- How to assess? Student preferences for methods to assess experiential learning: A best-worst scaling approach.PloS one · 2022Article
- E-learning to teach medical students about acute otitis media: A randomized controlled trial.Paediatrics & child health · 2021Article
- Online but not remote: Adapting field-based ecology laboratories for online learning.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Differentiating the learning styles of college students in different disciplines in a college English blended learning setting.PloS one · 2021Article
- Globalized blended education: securing synergies among far flung universities.SN social sciences · 2021Review
- Outcomes of Introducing a Mobile Interactive Learning Resource in a Large Medical School Course.Medical science educator · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Today's students have increased expectations for flexible learning options and evidence-based practice resources to be available to support curricular activities. We investigated: (i) the suitability of a static website for teaching ocular anatomy and physiology and an interactive version of the website with quiz and self-assessment activities and (ii) the usefulness of a blended online and in-lab environment to teach in Optometry. We administered a survey to compare responses of optometry students who had access to the interactive website, with those from students from a previous year who used the static version. We examined learning preferences of students in a focus group. Students were positive about the value of the website for their learning and the clarity of the website content. Nevertheless, objective comparison of pass rates for students using the static and interactive websites did not show significant changes. The majority of students commenting on the static website felt they did not get sufficient feedback via the website (67%) compared with only 22% from students who used self-assessments in the interactive website. Interestingly, users of the static website commented that it was perceived as just another resource while users of the interactive website commented on the usefulness of the material to review knowledge before laboratories. In the focus group, students reported they preferred a blended learning over the website alone even by students using the interactive website as they felt the need to revise content with the educator before the test. We conclude that there is acceptance of online learning methods due to the technologically 'savvy' environment of students in the first year of the Optometry programme but there is still dependence on the educator as the main administrator of their learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.