ArticlePloS one2018
Network-based features enable prediction of essential genes across diverse organisms.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- ProteomeLM: A proteome-scale language model enables accurate and rapid prediction of protein-protein interactions and gene essentiality across taxa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- CNN4Essential: a convolutional neural network model for predicting bacterial gene essentiality based on multi-feature fusion.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Epitope Generation Gateway: A biological context-dependent approach to cancer vaccine development.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Antibacterial Drug Discovery: Deep Learning Successes and Challenges through the Structural Biology Lens.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Machine learning approaches for predicting the small molecule-miRNA associations: a comprehensive review.Molecular diversity · 2025Review
- PRODE recovers essential and context-essential genes through neighborhood-informed scores.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine learning methods for predicting essential metabolic genes from Plasmodium falciparum genome-scale metabolic network.PloS one · 2024Article
- Evaluation of machine learning classifiers for predicting essential genes inBioinformation · 2022Article
- Bacterial genome reductions: Tools, applications, and challenges.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Review
- GENPPI: standalone software for creating protein interaction networks from genomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Identifying essential genes across eukaryotes by machine learning.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Article
- PangenomeNet: a pan-genome-based network reveals functional modules on antimicrobial resistome for Escherichia coli strains.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Proteome-Wide Mapping and Reverse Vaccinology Approaches to Design a Multi-Epitope Vaccine againstVaccines · 2021Article
- DELEAT: gene essentiality prediction and deletion design for bacterial genome reduction.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Ancestry analysis indicates two different sets of essential genes in eukaryotic model species.Functional & integrative genomics · 2021Article
- NetGenes: A Database of Essential Genes Predicted Using Features From Interaction Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- A Computational Framework Based on Ensemble Deep Neural Networks for Essential Genes Identification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- DeeplyEssential: a deep neural network for predicting essential genes in microbes.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning approaches to predict essential genes have gained a lot of traction in recent years. These approaches predominantly make use of sequence and network-based features to predict essential genes. However, the scope of network-based features used by the existing approaches is very narrow. Further, many of these studies focus on predicting essential genes within the same organism, which cannot be readily used to predict essential genes across organisms. Therefore, there is clearly a need for a method that is able to predict essential genes across organisms, by leveraging network-based features. In this study, we extract several sets of network-based features from protein-protein association networks available from the STRING database. Our network features include some common measures of centrality, and also some novel recursive measures recently proposed in social network literature. We extract hundreds of network-based features from networks of 27 diverse organisms to predict the essentiality of 87000+ genes. Our results show that network-based features are statistically significantly better at classifying essential genes across diverse bacterial species, compared to the current state-of-the-art methods, which use mostly sequence and a few 'conventional' network-based features. Our diverse set of network properties gave an AUROC of 0.847 and a precision of 0.320 across 27 organisms. When we augmented the complete set of network features with sequence-derived features, we achieved an improved AUROC of 0.857 and a precision of 0.335. We also constructed a reduced set of 100 sequence and network features, which gave a comparable performance. Further, we show that our features are useful for predicting essential genes in new organisms by using leave-one-species-out validation. Our network features capture the local, global and neighbourhood properties of the network and are hence effective for prediction of essential genes across diverse organisms, even in the absence of other complex biological knowledge. Our approach can be readily exploited to predict essentiality for organisms in interactome databases such as the STRING, where both network and sequence are readily available. All codes are available at https://github.com/RamanLab/nbfpeg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.