Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30543646›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Why do psychiatric patients attend or not attend treatment groups in the community: A qualitative study.

Merve Dilgul, Philip McNamee, Stavros Orfanos, Catherine Elizabeth Carr, Stefan Priebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Merve DilgulUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1207-3253
Philip McNameeUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Stavros OrfanosUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine Elizabeth CarrUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Stefan PriebeUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1014-35053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-attendance of treatment groups in the community has been a long-standing problem in mental health care. It has been found to have financial ramifications for services, worsen outcomes for those that do not attend and negatively impact on therapeutic group processes. There is a need to gain a better understanding of patients' reasons for attending or not attending. This study aimed to explore patient views on facilitators and barriers to the attendance of treatment groups in the community.

methodsThe study used interview data collected as part of three studies that investigated treatment groups for psychiatric patients in the community. Sixty-seven interview transcripts were analysed using the framework method.

resultsFive themes relating to facilitators of group attendance were identified: opportunity for autonomy; self-acknowledging need and therapist encouragement; optimal group format and safe environment; interest in content and enjoyment; actual and expected benefits of attendance. Four themes related to barriers: not being sufficiently informed; concerns about social interactions and the unknown; limited accessibility; and negative group dynamics.

conclusionTo facilitate attendance and reduce attrition to treatment groups in the community clinicians should address patient's wishes for information, capture their interest in the group modality, and potentially offer a 'trial' session. Furthermore, they should make the group location and time as accessible as possible and create a moderately sized group of six to eight patients. In these groups, mutual respect, feelings of safety and encouragement appear essential to make patients feel they can benefit from attendance.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsInterviews as TopicMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPsychotherapy, GroupResidence CharacteristicsSelf ConceptYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30543646
PMCPMC6292613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.