Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30543640›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Translating DREAMS into practice: Early lessons from implementation in six settings.

Natsayi Chimbindi, Isolde Birdthistle, Maryam Shahmanesh, Jane Osindo, Phillis Mushati, Kenneth Ondeng'e, Thembelihle Zuma, Tarisai Chiyaka, Nambusi Kyegombe, James Hargreaves and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Natsayi ChimbindiAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Isolde BirdthistleFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5742-6588
Maryam ShahmaneshAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Jane OsindoAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Phillis MushatiCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Kenneth Ondeng'eCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Thembelihle ZumaAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Tarisai ChiyakaCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Nambusi KyegombeFaculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
James HargreavesFaculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Joanna BuszaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sian FloydFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Janet SeeleyAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

Maximizing combination HIV prevention, uptake and retention by adolescent girls and young womenR01MH114560 · NIMH · KWAZULU-NATAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE TB-HIV · PI SHAHMANESH, MARYAM · 2017 to 2023
$2.0M
Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 'DREAMS Partnership' promotes a multi-sectoral approach to reduce adolescent girls and young women's (AGYW) vulnerability through a core package of interventions targeting multiple sources of HIV risk-to promote Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored and Safe (DREAMS) lives. Implementation of such multi-sectoral programmes is complex and requires adaptation to national and local contexts. We describe the early implementation of DREAMS in diverse settings, to identify lessons for the scale-up and replication of combination programmes for young people.

methodsAs part of evaluations underway in six DREAMS sites in three countries (Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe), we draw on process evaluation data collected from focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and in-depth interviews with beneficiaries, parents/caregivers, programme managers and opinion leaders. Additionally, structured observations were conducted and Gantt charts completed upon consultation with implementers. We concurrently reviewed documentation available on DREAMS and held cross-site discussions to interpret findings.

findingsAll sites sought to implement all components of the DREAMS core package, but how and when they were implemented varied by context. Models of delivery differed, with either multiple or single partners responsible for some or all interventions. Key challenges included the urgent and ambitious expectations of DREAMS; 'layering' multiple interventions across different sectors (health, education, social welfare); supporting individuals' journeys between services to improve uptake and retention; engaging communities beyond direct beneficiaries; avoiding perceived/actual exclusivity; and ensuring continuity of commitment and funding for DREAMS. Despite significant challenges, DREAMS was well-received in the communities and perceived by both beneficiaries and implementers to empower AGYW to remain HIV negative. Structures, protocols and tools were introduced to strengthen referrals and deliver services targeted to the age and circumstances of young people.

conclusionsThe benefits of combinations or integrated 'packages' of interventions are increasingly recognised. Early implementation of DREAMS provides useful lessons for improving coordination across multiple partners using a phased, systematic approach, regular adaptions to each unique context, and ensuring community ownership.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaYoung AdultZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID30543640
PMCPMC6292585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.