ArticlePloS one2018
Bayesian adjustment for trend of colorectal cancer incidence in misclassified registering across Iranian provinces.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence of colorectal cancer in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2024Review
- The spatial distribution of colorectal cancer relative risk in Iran: a nationwide spatial study.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Misclassification error is a common problem of cancer registries in developing countries that leads to biased cancer rates. The purpose of this research is to use Bayesian method for correcting misclassification in registered cancer incidence of eighteen provinces in Iran. Incidence data of patients with colorectal cancer were extracted from Iranian annual of national cancer registration reports from 2005 to 2008. A province with proper medical facilities can always be compared to its neighbors. Almost 28% of the misclassification was estimated between the province of East Azarbaijan and West Azarbaijan, 56% between Fars and Hormozgan, 43% between Isfahan and Charmahal and Bakhtyari, 46% between Isfahan and Lorestan, 58% between Razavi Khorasan and North Khorasan, 50% between Razavi Khorasan and South Khorasan, 74% between Razavi Khorasan and Sistan and Balochestan, 43% between Mazandaran and Golestan, 37% between Tehran and Qazvin, 45% between Tehran and Markazi, 42% between Tehran and Qom, 47% between Tehran and Zanjan. Correcting the regional misclassification and obtaining the correct rates of cancer incidence in different regions is necessary for making cancer control and prevention programs and in healthcare resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.