Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30543625›Full record

ReviewPLoS genetics2018

Micropeptide.

Maria E Sousa, Michael H Farkas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A micropeptide regulates seed desiccation.Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  9. Thousands of oscillating LncRNAs in the mouse testis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. LncRNA-encoded peptides in cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Small Open Reading Frame-Encoded Micro-Peptides: An Emerging Protein World.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria E SousaOphthalmology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8012-2838
Michael H FarkasOphthalmology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1102-3999

Funding

Using functional homology of RP1 isoforms to guide alternative therapeutic strategiesR01EY028553 · NEI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI FARKAS, MICHAEL · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMass SpectrometryOpen Reading FramesPeptidesPhylogenyPlant ProteinsProtein BiosynthesisProteogenomicsRibosomesSequence Analysis, RNABacterial ProteinsPeptidesPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30543625
PMCPMC6292567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.