Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30543350›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2019

Comparison of Immediate vs Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib: The SURTIME Randomized Clinical Trial.

Axel Bex, Peter Mulders, Michael Jewett, John Wagstaff, Johannes V van Thienen, Christian U Blank, Roland van Velthoven, Maria Del Pilar Laguna, Lori Wood, Harm H E van Melick and 10 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 260 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
260citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
36.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01099423 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Immediate Versus Deferred Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCRan2010 to 2017Enrolled99ConditionsKidney CancerArmstiming of surgery, gene expression analysis, biologic sample preservation procedure, laboratory biomarker analysis, therapeutic conventional surgery
NCT07233668 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Immediate Versus Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy With Ipilimumab/Nivolumab in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2025 to 2029Enrolled172ConditionsMetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ( mRCC)ArmsIpilimumab plus Nivolumab, Cytoreductive Nephrectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

260 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 476 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. SEOM SOGUG clinical guideline for treatment of kidney cancer (2022).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Progress in management of advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

200 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 5 countries.

Axel BexThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter MuldersDepartment of Urology, Radboud University Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Michael JewettDepartment of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John WagstaffDepartment of Oncology, Cardiff Hospital, Wales, United Kingdom.
Johannes V van ThienenThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Christian U BlankThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Roland van VelthovenDepartment of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
Maria Del Pilar LagunaDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Lori WoodDivision of Medical Oncology, QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Harm H E van MelickDepartment of Urology, Saint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Maureen J AartsDepartment of Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
J B LattoufDepartment of Surgery-Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Quebec, Ontario, Canada.
Thomas PowlesDepartment of Oncology, The Royal Free Hospital and Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom.
Igle Jan de Jong Md PhDDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Sylvie RotteyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Bertrand TombalDepartment of Urology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Sandrine MarreaudDepartment of Statistics, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Sandra ColletteDepartment of Statistics, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Laurence ColletteDepartment of Statistics, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
John HaanenThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEBristol-Myers Squibb (Belgium) · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEGhent University Hospital · BEInstitut Jules Bordet · BEIstanbul Medipol University · TRMaastricht University · NLPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre · CARadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GBUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In clinical practice, patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been offered cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by targeted therapy, but the optimal sequence of surgery and systemic therapy is unknown. Objective: To examine whether a period of sunitinib therapy before CN improves outcome compared with immediate CN followed by sunitinib. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial began as a phase 3 trial on July 14, 2010, and continued until March 24, 2016, with a median follow-up of 3.3 years and a clinical cutoff date for this report of May 5, 2017. Patients with mRCC of clear cell subtype, resectable primary tumor, and 3 or fewer surgical risk factors were studied. Interventions: Immediate CN followed by sunitinib therapy vs treatment with 3 cycles of sunitinib followed by CN in the absence of progression followed by sunitinib therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Progression-free survival was the primary end point, which needed a sample size of 458 patients. Because of poor accrual, the independent data monitoring committee endorsed reporting the intention-to-treat 28-week progression-free rate (PFR) instead. Overall survival (OS), adverse events, and postoperative progression were secondary end points. Results: The study closed after 5.7 years with 99 patients (80 men and 19 women; mean [SD] age, 60 [8.5] years). The 28-week PFR was 42% in the immediate CN arm (n = 50) and 43% in the deferred CN arm (n = 49) (P = .61). The intention-to-treat OS hazard ratio of deferred vs immediate CN was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = .03), with a median OS of 32.4 months (95% CI, 14.5-65.3 months) in the deferred CN arm and 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.3-29.5 months) in the immediate CN arm. In the deferred CN arm, 48 of 49 patients (98%; 95% CI, 89%-100%) received sunitinib vs 40 of 50 (80%; 95% CI, 67%-89%) in the immediate arm. Systemic progression before planned CN in the deferred CN arm resulted in a per-protocol recommendation against nephrectomy in 14 patients (29%; 95% CI, 18%-43%). Conclusions and Relevance: Deferred CN did not improve the 28-week PFR. With the deferred approach, more patients received sunitinib and OS results were higher. Pretreatment with sunitinib may identify patients with inherent resistance to systemic therapy before planned CN. This evidence complements recent data from randomized clinical trials to inform treatment decisions in patients with primary clear cell mRCC requiring sunitinib. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01099423.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyNephrectomyAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCanadaCarcinoma, Renal CellChemotherapy, AdjuvantCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleEuropeFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID30543350
PMCPMC6439568
OpenAlexW2904657085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.