Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30543045›Full record

ArticlePlant reproduction2019

Iterative subtraction facilitates automated, quantitative analysis of multiple pollen tube growth features.

Nathaniel Ponvert, Jacob Goldberg, Alexander Leydon, Mark A Johnson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant reproduction, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathaniel PonvertDepartment of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Jacob GoldbergDepartment of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Alexander LeydonDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Mark A JohnsonDepartment of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. Mark_Johnson_1@brown.edu.

Funding

TRAINING IN MOLECULAR &CELL BIOLOGY &BIOCHEMISTRYT32GM007601 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MOWRY, KIMBERLY L. · 1985 to 2019
$6.4M
National Science Foundation IOS-1540019NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In flowering plants, successful reproduction and generation of seed depends on the delivery of immotile sperm to female gametes via the pollen tube. As reproduction in flowering plants is the cornerstone of our agricultural industry, there is a need to uncover the genes, small molecules, and environmental conditions that affect pollen tube growth dynamics. However, methods for measuring pollen tube phenotypes are labor intensive, and suffer from a tradeoff between workload and resolution. To approach these problems, we use an image analysis technique called Automated Stack Iterative Subtraction (ASIST). Our tool converts growing pollen tube tips into closed particles, making the automated simultaneous extraction of multiple pollen tube phenotypes from hundreds of individual cells tractable via existing particle identification technology. Here we use our tool to analyze growth dynamics of pollen tubes in vitro, and semi in vivo. We show that ASIST provides a framework for robust, high throughput analysis of pollen tube growth behaviors in populations of cells, thus facilitating pollen tube phenomics.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisAutomationData CollectionFluorescent Antibody TechniqueImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIn Vitro TechniquesPollen TubeSolanum lycopersicumAutomationGrowth dynamicsPhenomicsPollen tubeTip extension

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.