ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019
Applying Machine Learning Algorithms to Segment High-Cost Patient Populations.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unsupervised algorithms to identify potential under-coding of secondary diagnoses in hospitalisations databases in Portugal.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2024Article
- Subgroups of High-Cost Patients and Their Preventable Inpatient Cost in Rural China.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Characterizing hospitalization trajectories in the high-need, high-cost population using electronic health record data.Health affairs scholar · 2023Article
- A scoping review of the clinical application of machine learning in data-driven population segmentation analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Differential Impact of a Plan-Led Standardized Complex Care Management Intervention on Subgroups of High-Cost High-Need Medicaid Patients.Population health management · 2023Article
- A Framework for Automatic Clustering of EHR Messages Using a Spatial Clustering Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Temporal Patterns of High-Spend Subgroups Can Inform Service Strategy for Medicare Advantage Enrollees.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Simulation-derived best practices for clustering clinical data.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021Article
- Article
- Use of Data-Driven Methods to Predict Long-term Patterns of Health Care Spending for Medicare Patients.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Not there yet: using data-driven methods to predict who becomes costly among low-cost patients with type 2 diabetes.BMC endocrine disorders · 2020Article
- Unsupervised machine learning and prognostic factors of survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Subgroups of High-Cost Medicare Advantage Patients: an Observational Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEfforts to improve the value of care for high-cost patients may benefit from care management strategies targeted at clinically distinct subgroups of patients.
objectiveTo evaluate the performance of three different machine learning algorithms for identifying subgroups of high-cost patients.
designWe applied three different clustering algorithms-connectivity-based clustering using agglomerative hierarchical clustering, centroid-based clustering with the k-medoids algorithm, and density-based clustering with the OPTICS algorithm-to a clinical and administrative dataset. We then examined the extent to which each algorithm identified subgroups of patients that were (1) clinically distinct and (2) associated with meaningful differences in relevant utilization metrics.
participantsPatients enrolled in a national Medicare Advantage plan, categorized in the top decile of spending (n = 6154). MAIN MEASURES: Post hoc discriminative models comparing the importance of variables for distinguishing observations in one cluster from the rest. Variance in utilization and spending measures. KEY
resultsConnectivity-based, centroid-based, and density-based clustering identified eight, five, and ten subgroups of high-cost patients, respectively. Post hoc discriminative models indicated that density-based clustering subgroups were the most clinically distinct. The variance of utilization and spending measures was the greatest among the subgroups identified through density-based clustering.
conclusionsMachine learning algorithms can be used to segment a high-cost patient population into subgroups of patients that are clinically distinct and associated with meaningful differences in utilization and spending measures. For these purposes, density-based clustering with the OPTICS algorithm outperformed connectivity-based and centroid-based clustering algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.