Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30542971›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2019

Bike Lane Obstructions in Manhattan, New York City: Implications for Bicyclist Safety.

Corey H Basch, Danna Ethan, Charles E Basch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Corey H BaschDepartment of Public Health, William Paterson University, University Hall 366, Wayne, NJ, 07470, USA. baschc@wpunj.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4862-4229
Danna EthanDepartment of Health Sciences, Lehman College, The City University of New York, Bronx, NY, 10468, USA.
Charles E BaschHealth and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 5 years, the number of regular cyclists in New York City (NYC) increased by ~ 140,000 to over 800,000 regular riders. Aiming to promote safe cycling, NYC has developed over 1000 miles of planned commuting and recreational bike paths across its five boroughs. Bike lane obstructions pose a safety risk to cyclists but the extent of such obstructions is unknown. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to document the frequency and rate of obstructions in protected bike lanes throughout Manhattan, NYC. During the fall of 2018, bicycle obstructions were observed in ten zones of Manhattan, NYC. Three kinds of obstructions within the bicycle lanes were coded: object, pedestrian, and vehicle. A total of 233 obstructions in the protected bike lanes were observed in this study. Obstructions per zone ranged from 11 to 39. The most common type of obstruction was objects, which accounted for 53.2% (n = 124) of obstructions and ranged through zones from 2 to 22. People were the second most common obstruction, which accounted for 28.3% (n = 66) of the obstructions, with a range of 1-22. Vehicles accounted for the remaining 18.5% (n = 43) of the obstructions with a range of 1-9 throughout zones. Findings of this study indicate that, even in "protected" lanes, bikers may be forced into traffic or to approach parked cars, increasing the risk of being "doored."

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficBicyclingCity PlanningCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNew York CitySafetyBicyclingBike lanesNew York CityObstructions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.