Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30542744›Full record

Observational studyKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Cartilage repair surgery prevents progression of knee degeneration.

Pia M Jungmann, Alexandra S Gersing, Frederic Baumann, Christian Holwein, Sepp Braun, Jan Neumann, Julia Zarnowski, Felix C Hofmann, Andreas B Imhoff, Ernst J Rummeny and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Pia M JungmannDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. pia.jungmann@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2198-3678
Alexandra S GersingDepartment of Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Frederic BaumannClinical and Interventional Angiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian HolweinDepartment of Sportsorthopedic Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sepp BraunDepartment of Sportsorthopedic Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Jan NeumannMusculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Julia ZarnowskiMusculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Felix C HofmannMusculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Andreas B ImhoffDepartment of Sportsorthopedic Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Ernst J RummenyDepartment of Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Thomas M LinkMusculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Zurich · CHBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau · DEGelenkpunkt · AT

Funding

DATA COORDINATING CENTER FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-264022258N01AR022258 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SYS OFFICE/PRES · 2003 to 2003
–
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-264022259-264022259N01AR022259 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT BALT · PI HOCHBERG, MARC C. · 2002 to 2006
–
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-N01AR22260N01AR022260 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH · PI KWOH, KENT · 2002 to 2006
–
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-N01AR22261N01AR022261 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH · PI JACKSON, REBECCA · 2002 to 2006
–
CLINICAL CENTER FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS-264022262-264022262N01AR022262 · NIAMS · THE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL · PI ASSAF, ANNLOUISE R. · 2002 to 2006
–
B. Braun-Stiftung BBST-D-17-00070R1NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-2-2258NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-2-2259NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-2-2260NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-2-2261NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-2-2262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate, whether cartilage repair surgery for focal osteochondral defects at the knee results in less degenerative changes over 6 years in a MR imaging follow-up than morphologically initially identical defects in non-operated control subjects from the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI).

methodsA total of 32 individuals received baseline and follow-up MRI. In n = 16 patients with cartilage repair [osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS), n = 12; spongiosa-augmented matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI), n = 4] MRI was performed preoperatively and after 5.7 ± 2.3 year follow-up. Baseline MRIs of non-operated subjects from the OAI were screened for initially identical cartilage defects (n = 16). Morphological knee abnormalities were assessed using WORMS, AMADEUS and MOCART scores. A sagittal 2D MSME sequence was implemented for quantitative cartilage T2 relaxation time measurements in all (0, 2, 4, 6 and 8-years) follow-ups from the OAI and in the postoperative MRI protocol.

resultsFor both groups, focal osteochondral defects were located at the femoral condyle in 8/16 cases (5 medial, 3 lateral) and at the patella in 8/16 cases. At baseline, the mean cartilage defect size ± SD was 1.4 ± 1.3 cm

conclusionsPatients with cartilage repair showed less progression of degenerative MRI changes at 6-year follow-up than a control cohort from the OAI with initially identical osteochondral defects. Patients with focal cartilage defects may profit from cartilage repair surgery since it may prevent progression of early osteoarthritis at the knee joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level II.

Indexed as

AdultCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleFemurFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedic ProceduresOsteoarthritisCartilageCartilage repairKneeMR imagingOsteoarthritisOsteochondral transplantationOutcome

Identifiers

PMID30542744
OpenAlexW2904557111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.