Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30542513›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

NY-ESO-1 antigen expression and immune response are associated with poor prognosis in MAGE-A4-vaccinated patients with esophageal or head/neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Shugo Ueda, Yoshihiro Miyahara, Yasuhiro Nagata, Eiichi Sato, Taizo Shiraishi, Naozumi Harada, Hiroaki Ikeda, Hiroshi Shiku, Shinichi Kageyama

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Sperm proteins and cancer-testis antigens are released by the seminiferous tubules in mice and men.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The immune landscape of esophageal cancer.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shugo UedaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery and Oncology, Kitano Hospital, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-8480, Japan.
Yoshihiro MiyaharaDepartment of Personalized Cancer Immunotherapy, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan.
Yasuhiro NagataCenter for Comprehensive Community Care Education, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan.
Eiichi SatoDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Taizo ShiraishiDepartment of Oncologic Pathology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan.
Naozumi HaradaUnited Immunity, Co., Ltd., Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan.
Hiroaki IkedaDepartment of Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan.
Hiroshi ShikuDepartments of Immuno-Gene Therapy and Personalized Cancer Immunotherapy, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan.
Shinichi KageyamaDepartment of Immuno-Gene Therapy, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan.
Mie University · JPNagasaki University · JPKitano Hospital · JPTokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAGE-A4 antigen is a cancer-testis antigen that is frequently expressed in tumor tissues. Cholesteryl pullulan (CHP) is a novel antigen delivery system for cancer vaccines. This study evaluated the safety, immune responses and clinical outcomes of patients who received a CHP-MAGE-A4 vaccine. Twenty-two patients with advanced or metastatic cancer were enrolled, and were subcutaneously vaccinated with either 100 μg or 300 μg of CHP-MAGE-A4. Seven and 15 patients, respectively, were repeatedly vaccinated with 100 μg or 300 μg of CHP-MAGE-A4; patients in both groups received a median of 7 doses. No serious adverse events related to the vaccine were observed. Of 7 patients receiving the 100 μg dose, 2 (29%) showed immune responses, compared with 3 of the 14 (21%) patients who received the 300 μg dose. In total, MAGE-A4-specific antibody responses were induced in 5 of 21 (24%) patients. No differences in survival were seen between patients receiving the 100 μg and 300 μg doses, or between immune responders and non-responders. Eleven (50%) patients had pre-existing antibodies to NY-ESO-1. In 16 patients with esophageal or head/neck squamous cell carcinoma, the survival time was significantly shorter in those who had NY-ESO-1-co-expressing tumors. Patients with high pre-existing antibody responses to NY-ESO-1 displayed worse prognosis than those with no pre-existing response. Therefore, in planning clinical trials of MAGE-A4 vaccine, enrolling NY-ESO-1-expressing tumor or not would be a critical issue to be discussed. Combination vaccines of MAGE-A4 and NY-ESO-1 antigens would be one of the strategies to overcome the poor prognosis.

Indexed as

cancer vaccineesophageal cancerimmune responseMAGE-A4NY-ESO-1

Identifiers

PMID30542513
PMCPMC6267599
OpenAlexW2901625439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.