ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
A novel surgical method for treating medial-end clavicle fractures.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of a Complex Medial-End Clavicle Fracture With Hook Plate Fixation After Failed Prior Surgeries: A Case Report and Narrative Review of Surgical Options.Case reports in orthopedics · 2026Article
- Bilateral clavicle fractures of the medial third treated by inverted anatomic locking plates: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Displaced medial clavicle fractures: a systematic review of outcomes after nonoperative and operative management.JSES international · 2023Article
- A Sternoclavicular Joint-Specific Plate for the Displaced Medial-End Clavicle Fracture.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- MiR-193a-3p Promotes Fracture Healing via Targeting PTEN Gene.Molecular biotechnology · 2021Article
- An evaluation of treatment options for medial, midshaft, and distal clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES international · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study examined the effectiveness of the method of inversing the distal clavicle anatomic locking plate to treat medial-end clavicle fractures. This involved retrospectively analyzing six cases of medial-end clavicle fractures treated using the method of inversing the distal clavicle anatomic locking plate between September 2013 and December 2015. These cases included five men and one woman with an average age of 46.3±10.6 years old and a range of 24-66 years old. Among these cases, one was type A, two were type C, and three were type D, based on the Throckmorton type classification. All patients had fresh closed fractures, which were caused by direct injury. A regular postoperative follow-up was performed and the therapeutic efficacy was evaluated systematically with reference to the Rockwood and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score standards. All six cases had a follow-up visit, which was between 10 and 14 months with an average of 12.0±2.2 months. All patients exhibited osseous healing and functional recovery without incision infection, nerve vascular injury, chest injury, fracture nonunion, or other complications. According to the Rockwood and DASH score standards, evaluation of the curative effect showed that five cases were excellent and one case was good, and the associated rate for achieving good or excellent outcomes was 100%. All of the DASH scores were <10. These results indicated that the effect of the treatment of medial-end clavicle fractures by the method of inversing the distal clavicle anatomic locking plate was reliable, and the functional recovery of patients was good, making this method worthy of clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.