ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Effect and clinical value of coagulation test on adverse reactions of blood transfusion in patients with major bleeding in ectopic pregnancy.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequential intramural pregnancies in the right uterine cornu after the transfer of two embryos in a single cycle: a case report and literature review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Review
- Prevalence and Related Factors of Rupture among Cases with Ectopic Pregnancy; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2024Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Influence and clinical value of coagulation test on adverse reactions of blood transfusion in patients with major bleeding of ectopic pregnancy were analyzed. Six hundred and twenty-seven cases of ectopic pregnancy admitted to Zibo First Hospital from July 2014 to March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The 369 patients who had adverse reactions after blood transfusion were selected as the experimental group. Another 258 patients without adverse reaction after blood transfusion were selected as the control group. Blood samples were collected 8 h before and after blood transfusion in both groups, and blood test was performed including blood count (RBC), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count (PLT), HB, hematocrit (HCT), as well as indicators of coagulation, including thrombin time (TT), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and fibrinogen (FIB). There was no significant difference between the two groups in blood routine and blood coagulation test (P>0.05). After transfusion, the RBC, WBC, PLT, HB and HCT in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). TT, PT and APTT were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), while FIB was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.001). The coagulation in the experimental group after blood transfusion was significantly worse than that in the control group. Coagulation test can be used as a marker of adverse reactions after transfusion in patients with massive bleeding in pregnancy, providing reference and guidance for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.