Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30542276›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience2018

Astrocyte-Neuron Networks: A Multilane Highway of Signaling for Homeostatic Brain Function.

Sara Mederos, Candela González-Arias, Gertrudis Perea

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cell type-specific gene therapy confers protection against motor neuron disease caused by a TFG variant.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. GEARBOCS: An Adeno Associated Virus Tool forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara MederosDepartment of Functional and Systems Neurobiology, Instituto Cajal (IC), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Candela González-AriasDepartment of Functional and Systems Neurobiology, Instituto Cajal (IC), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Gertrudis PereaDepartment of Functional and Systems Neurobiology, Instituto Cajal (IC), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on glial cells over the past 30 years has confirmed the critical role of astrocytes in pathophysiological brain states. However, most of our knowledge about astrocyte physiology and of the interactions between astrocytes and neurons is based on the premises that astrocytes constitute a homogeneous cell type, without considering the particular properties of the circuits or brain nuclei in which the astrocytes are located. Therefore, we argue that more-sophisticated experiments are required to elucidate the specific features of astrocytes in different brain regions, and even within different layers of a particular circuit. Thus, in addition to considering the diverse mechanisms used by astrocytes to communicate with neurons and synaptic partners, it is necessary to take into account the cellular heterogeneity that likely contributes to the outcomes of astrocyte-neuron signaling. In this review article, we briefly summarize the current data regarding the anatomical, molecular and functional properties of astrocyte-neuron communication, as well as the heterogeneity within this communication.

Indexed as

astrocytesbehaviorheterogeneityneuron–glia signalingsynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID30542276
PMCPMC6277918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.