ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019
The Role of Meaning in Visual Memory: Face-Selective Brain Activity Predicts Memory for Ambiguous Face Stimuli.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The working memory advantage for meaningful stimuli persists under high levels of proactive interference.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Task-relevant representational spaces in human memory traces.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Implicit effect of visual long-term memory for nonverbal objects on recognition judgment.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Predicting image memorability from evoked feelings.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Semantic meaning enhances feature-binding but not quantity or precision of locations in visual working memory.Memory & cognition · 2024Article
- Image memorability is linked to facilitated perceptual and semantic processing.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Massive visual long-term memory is largely dependent on meaning.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory research.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Review
- The fate of visual long term memories for images across weeks in adults and children.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Human faces and face-like stimuli are more memorable.PsyCh journal · 2022Article
- Relationships between expertise and distinctiveness: Abnormal medical images lead to enhanced memory performance only in experts.Memory & cognition · 2021Article
- Understanding Image Memorability.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How people process images is known to affect memory for those images, but these effects have typically been studied using explicit task instructions to vary encoding. Here, we investigate the effects of intrinsic variation in processing on subsequent memory, testing whether recognizing an ambiguous stimulus as meaningful (as a face vs as shape blobs) predicts subsequent visual memory even when matching the perceptual features and the encoding strategy between subsequently remembered and subsequently forgotten items. We show in adult humans of either sex that single trial EEG activity can predict whether participants will subsequently remember an ambiguous Mooney face image (e.g., an image that will sometimes be seen as a face and sometimes not be seen as a face). In addition, we show that a classifier trained only to discriminate between whether participants perceive a face versus non-face can generalize to predict whether an ambiguous image is subsequently remembered. Furthermore, when we examine the N170, an event-related potential index of face processing, we find that images that elicit larger N170s are more likely to be remembered than those that elicit smaller N170s, even when the exact same image elicited larger or smaller N170s across participants. Thus, images processed as meaningful, in this case as a face, during encoding are better remembered than identical images that are not processed as a face. This provides strong evidence that understanding the meaning of a stimulus during encoding plays a critical role in visual memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.