Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30541724›Full record

ReviewThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2019

Dealing with the gray zones in the management of gastric cancer: The consensus statement of the İstanbul Group.

Erman Aytaç, Fatih Aslan, Bahattin Çicek, Sibel Erdamar, Bengi Gürses, Koray Güven, Okan Falay, Tayfun Karahasanoğlu, Fatih Selçukbiricik, Uğur Selek and 22 more

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Total versus subtotal gastrectomy following neoadjuvant flot chemotherapy for distal diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma: an international cohort study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Comment on "Dealing with the gray zones in the management of gastric cancer: The consensus statement of the İstanbul Group".The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erman AytaçAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Fatih AslanKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Bahattin ÇicekAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Sibel ErdamarAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Bengi GürsesKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Koray GüvenAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Okan FalayKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Tayfun KarahasanoğluAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Fatih SelçukbiricikKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Uğur SelekKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Banu AtalarAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Emre BalıkKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Nurdan TözünAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
İzzet RozanesKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ali ArıcanAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
İsmail HamzaoğluAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Bilgi BacaAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Nil Molinas MandelKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Murat SaruçAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Süha GökselAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Gökhan DemirAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Fulya AğaoğluAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Cengiz YakıcıerAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Uğur ÖzbekAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Volkan ÖzbenAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Enis ÖzyarAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet Levent GünerAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Özlem ErAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Kerim KabanKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Yasemin BölükbaşıAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Dursun BuğraKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
The İstanbul GroupAcıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Kent Hastanesi · TRKoç University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The geographical location and differences in tumor biology significantly change the management of gastric cancer. The prevalence of gastric cancer ranks fifth and sixth among men and women, respectively, in Turkey. The international guidelines from the Eastern and Western countries fail to manage a considerable amount of inconclusive issues in the management of gastric cancer. The uncertainties lead to significant heterogeneities in clinical practice, lack of homogeneous data collection, and subsequently, diverse outcomes. The physicians who are professionally involved in the management of gastric cancer at two institutions in Istanbul, Turkey, organized a consensus meeting to address current problems and plan feasible, logical, measurable, and collective solutions in their clinical practice for this challenging disease. The evidence-based data and current guidelines were reviewed. The gray zones in the management of gastric cancer were determined in the first session of this consensus meeting. The second session was constructed to discuss, vote, and ratify the ultimate decisions. The identification of the T stage, the esophagogastric area, imaging algorithm for proper staging and follow-up, timing and patient selection for neoadjuvant treatment, and management of advanced and metastatic disease have been accepted as the major issues in the management of gastric cancer. The recommendations are presented with the percentage of supporting votes in the results section with related data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPatient SelectionPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrevalenceStomach NeoplasmsTurkey

Identifiers

PMID30541724
PMCPMC6629281
OpenAlexW2902927237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.