Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30541580›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2018

"It's on everyone's plate": a qualitative study into physicians' perceptions of responsibility for smoking cessation.

E Meijer, M Kampman, M S Geisler, N H Chavannes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Involving Societal Stakeholders in Dementia Risk Reduction: An Explorative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tobacco Cessation Curriculum in Medical Schools: a Scoping Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E MeijerPublic Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, PO Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. e.meijer@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7078-5067
M KampmanPublic Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, PO Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
M S GeislerPublic Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, PO Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
N H ChavannesPublic Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, PO Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle research has investigated in-depth how physicians perceive their role in smoking cessation care. This qualitative study sought to understand physicians' perceptions of responsibility for smoking cessation.

methodsData were collected through individual semi-structured interviews and focus group interviews between June and November 2017 in The Netherlands. We interviewed 5 addiction specialists, 5 anesthesiologist, 4 cardiologists, 8 GPs, 5 internists, 5 neurologists, 2 pediatricians, 6 pulmonologists, 7 surgeons, and 8 youth healthcare physicians (N = 55). Data analysis followed the framework approach.

resultsThe analysis showed that three actors were perceived as responsible for smoking cessation: physicians, patients, and the government. Participants perceived physicians as responsible for facilitating smoking cessation -albeit to different extents-, patients as carrying the ultimate responsibility for quitting smoking, and the government as responsible for creating a society in which smoking uptake is more difficult and quitting smoking easier. Perceptions of smoking itself were found to be important for how participants viewed responsibility for smoking cessation. It remained unclear for many participants which healthcare provider is responsible for smoking cessation care.

conclusionsThe organization of smoking cessation care within health systems should be a focus of intervention, to better define physician roles and perceptions of responsibility. In addition, it seems important to target perceptions of smoking itself on the level of physicians and -as suggested by comments by several participants- the government.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelProfessional RoleCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatientsPhysiciansQualitative ResearchSmoking CessationFramework approachInterviewsPerceptionsPhysiciansSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID30541580
PMCPMC6290505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.