Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30541543›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Detecting the priority areas for health workforce allocation with LISA functions: an empirical analysis for China.

Bin Zhu, Yang Fu, Jinlin Liu, Rongxin He, Ning Zhang, Ying Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Current situation and distribution equality of public health resource in China.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2020
    Article
  13. Addressing the Licensed Doctor Maldistribution in China: A Demand-And-Supply Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bin ZhuSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China.
Yang FuCollege of Management, Shenzhen University, Nanhai Ave 3688, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jinlin LiuSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China.
Rongxin HeSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China.
Ning ZhangSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China.
Ying MaoSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China. mao_ying@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8271-2524

Funding

Major Project of National Social Science Fund of China 17ZDA079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth workforce misdistribution leads to severe inequity and low-efficiency in health services in the developing countries. Targeting at China, this research aims to reveal, visualize and compare the geographical distribution patterns of different subtypes of urban and rural health workforce and identify the priority regions for health workforce planning and allocation policies designing.

methodsThe health workforce density (workforce-to-population ratio) is adopted to represent the accessibility to health workforce in each geographical unit. Besides a descriptive geography of health workforce as a whole, the local indicators of spatial association (LISA) are used to explore the spatial clusters of different subtypes of health workforce, which are visualized by geographical tools.

resultsResults reveal that regional disparities and spatial clusters exist in China's health workforce distribution, with different types of workforce exhibiting relatively different spatial distribution characteristics. Besides, huge urban-rural disparities are found in the distribution of health workforce in China. Unexpectedly but intriguingly, most of the high-high and high-low cluster area of urban health workforce are concentrated in the western China (Xinjiang, Xizang etc.), indicating the relative abundant stock of urban health workforce in these units, while the low-low and low-high cluster area of different types of urban health workforce are mainly distributed in middle China. Regarding the rural health workforce, there is an obvious and similar low-low and low-high clustering pattern in western provinces (Sichuan, Yunnan) for the licensed doctors, pharmacists, technologists, which play a critical role in health services delivery.

conclusionsDifferent types of health workforce displayed distinct spatial distribution patterns, while the misdistribution of rural health workforce imposed more challenges to the Chinese health sector due to its poorer stock and more disadvantaged positions of backward regions (i.e., low-low and low-high cluster area). Subtype-specific and region-oriented health workforce planning and allocation policies are suggested to be made, aiming at the urban and rural health workforce respectively, by prioritizing the identified low-low and low-high cluster areas.

Indexed as

Health Services AdministrationResource AllocationChinaGeographyHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHealth WorkforceHumansPhysiciansRural Health ServicesChinaHealth workforceLocal indicators of spatial associationLocal Moran’s ISpatial autocorrelation

Identifiers

PMID30541543
PMCPMC6292090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.